USN Systems (02/26/2013)

Message

Website · July 19th, 2011, 4:31 pm

acelanceloet wrote:SPY-3 is made to direct ESSM and the SM series, IIRC.

Sweet. Now I no longer need a Mk95 on my CVN and LHDN.

#102 Post by **gkm** » July 20th, 2011, 3:20 am

theoretically an SM-2 Block III may be able to fit in a Mk-13 launcher - within a few inches to spare.

#103 Post by **paul_541** » July 20th, 2011, 6:16 pm

I enlarged the front views of Harpoon's launchers. Isn't more good according the others views in the drawing !?

Thanks for comments.

#104 Post by **TimothyC** » July 20th, 2011, 7:47 pm

gkm wrote:theoretically an SM-2 Block III may be able to fit in a Mk-13 launcher - within a few inches to spare.

Yes it can, but I haven't bashed one together, and as far as I know, the USN never deployed the SM-2MR in the manner. If someone wants to they could try and bash one together and it might make it to the sheet, I'd have to see what it looks like.

paul_541 wrote:I enlarged the front views of Harpoon's launchers. Isn't more good according the others views in the drawing !?

Thanks for comments.

I'm not sure the change is in order. If you have some scale drawings of the Mk-141 then I'd consider it, but right now I'm going to stick with the recent version that has been drawn.

#105 Post by **squizzy** » July 23rd, 2011, 1:45 pm

paul_541 wrote:I enlarged the front views of Harpoon's launchers. Isn't more good according the others views in the drawing !?

Thanks for comments.

Paul I glad you saw the same too! When I first saw the new re-modelled Mk-141 launch canisters i too sought that the canisters on the launch frame looked a pixel or 2 out also and did a similar change to my sheet after i downloaded the latest updated USN parts sheet but sought that i was alone on the spotting.

#106 Post by **Colosseum** » July 23rd, 2011, 11:46 pm

When are you ever going to fix the Mk.37 GFCS? The ones on the sheet are the ancient ones I drew for the original iteration of the Fletcher DDs. There is a really nice updated version on the Alaskas.... and have been for some time now.

#107 Post by **TimothyC** » July 23rd, 2011, 11:55 pm

Colosseum wrote:When are you ever going to fix the Mk.37 GFCS? The ones on the sheet are the ancient ones I drew for the original iteration of the Fletcher DDs. There is a really nice updated version on the Alaskas.... and have been for some time now.

I didn't know it was in need of updating, but I'll mark it down. I've got midterms this next week so it may be next weekend before I push the update, or it maybe later tonight - it just depends on how bored I get.

#108 Post by **erik_t** » July 24th, 2011, 1:07 am

That's largely my fault. The grand unified US parts sheet predates the new Alaska by quite a while, and sometimes I just failed to correctly push an updated part.

#109 Post by **Cybermax** » August 25th, 2011, 4:41 am

155mm AGS Lite

http://events.us.baesystems.com/SAS/pro ... -Lite.html

#110 Post by **Colombamike** » August 25th, 2011, 7:05 am

Cybermax wrote:155mm AGS Lite
http://events.us.baesystems.com/SAS/pro ... -Lite.html

HOW !!!

Extremely interesting & very usefull for a possible Arleigh Burke Flight III
(more smaller/compact, more "light-weight" mount)

Shipbucket

USN Systems (02/26/2013)

Re: USN Systems

Re: USN Systems

Re: USN Systems

Re: USN Systems

Re: USN Systems

Re: USN Systems

Re: USN Systems

Re: USN Systems

Re: USN Systems

Re: USN Systems