Incorrectly Placed Images
Moderator: Community Manager
-
- Posts: 4712
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: Incorrectly Placed Images
Sorry for use it here, but can't find a proper one and I have very limited time on the net.
Defense Technology Magazine page
Right lower corner boys... I don't see any credits, and I'm sure they should be one.
Defense Technology Magazine page
Right lower corner boys... I don't see any credits, and I'm sure they should be one.
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!
Re: Incorrectly Placed Images
Thank you Kim for the crest
"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: May 3rd, 2015, 6:14 pm
- Location: San Jose, California
- Contact:
Re: Incorrectly Placed Images
I found two SB scale drawings in the FD scale Never Built archive:
Space Launch System family - USA
http://shipbucket.com/vehicles/2713
Shuttle C - USA
http://shipbucket.com/vehicles/2712
Space Launch System family - USA
http://shipbucket.com/vehicles/2713
Shuttle C - USA
http://shipbucket.com/vehicles/2712
- Dan
Work List:
Eastern Air Lines Fleet History
Around the world challenge
US Attack Aircraft History
Work List:
Eastern Air Lines Fleet History
Around the world challenge
US Attack Aircraft History
Re: Incorrectly Placed Images
@Orionfield
Already sorted. Thanks for vigilance.
Already sorted. Thanks for vigilance.
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: May 3rd, 2015, 6:14 pm
- Location: San Jose, California
- Contact:
Re: Incorrectly Placed Images
No problem.
- Dan
Work List:
Eastern Air Lines Fleet History
Around the world challenge
US Attack Aircraft History
Work List:
Eastern Air Lines Fleet History
Around the world challenge
US Attack Aircraft History
Re: Incorrectly Placed Images
In this site there is, undoubtedly, a PPA drawn by Little Bird, with credit of another guy.
https://www.deviantart.com/nascimenttob ... -804655958
https://www.deviantart.com/nascimenttob ... -804655958
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: November 27th, 2017, 10:15 am
Re: Incorrectly Placed Images
Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8387
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8388
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8389
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8391
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8393
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8394
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8395
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8390
I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8387
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8388
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8389
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8391
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8393
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8394
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8395
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8390
I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them
Re: Incorrectly Placed Images
Indeed, I considered that eventuality during upload, but in the end I don't share Your opinion. Many of them in literature are described as simply "patrol boats/craft" (of course line between PC/PB and FACG is rather blurry), and some of them are definitely not fast.homeSniper wrote: ↑May 4th, 2020, 7:50 am Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
(...)
I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: November 27th, 2017, 10:15 am
Re: Incorrectly Placed Images
In China, those ships are officially called “护卫艇”, could be translated as "escort boat" or "small corvette". Due to lacking destroyers and frigates, those small ships were actually major combat resource of most Chinese costal defence fleets in about 1950-1970, not just patrol vessels. This is why I think they should be classified as "Costal Warfare". Only Type 62-1G can be an exception, as it is designed as a patrol boat.eswube wrote: ↑May 4th, 2020, 6:14 pmIndeed, I considered that eventuality during upload, but in the end I don't share Your opinion. Many of them in literature are described as simply "patrol boats/craft" (of course line between PC/PB and FACG is rather blurry), and some of them are definitely not fast.homeSniper wrote: ↑May 4th, 2020, 7:50 am Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
(...)
I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them
For Type 55A and Type 62 series, FACG is OK, they are fast. For Type 52A/53A/54A and the Japanese gunboat, indeed they're not fast enough, maybe just call them "Gunboats" would be fine
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8390 this one has wrong picture, No.808 should be a Type 53A. but the picture is No.517, a Type 52A