Incorrectly Placed Images

Discuss anything related to Shipbucket here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Rhade
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

#102 Post by Rhade »

Sorry for use it here, but can't find a proper one and I have very limited time on the net.

Defense Technology Magazine page

Image

Right lower corner boys... I don't see any credits, and I'm sure they should be one.
Image
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!
Novice
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat

Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

#103 Post by Novice »

In Real Life section of Great Britain this two, which are in fact the same.
One should be removed
Image Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
orionfield
Posts: 177
Joined: May 3rd, 2015, 6:14 pm
Location: San Jose, California
Contact:

Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

#104 Post by orionfield »

I found two SB scale drawings in the FD scale Never Built archive:

Space Launch System family - USA
http://shipbucket.com/vehicles/2713

Shuttle C - USA
http://shipbucket.com/vehicles/2712
- Dan

Work List:
Eastern Air Lines Fleet History
Around the world challenge
US Attack Aircraft History
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

#105 Post by eswube »

@Orionfield
Already sorted. Thanks for vigilance.
orionfield
Posts: 177
Joined: May 3rd, 2015, 6:14 pm
Location: San Jose, California
Contact:

Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

#106 Post by orionfield »

No problem.
- Dan

Work List:
Eastern Air Lines Fleet History
Around the world challenge
US Attack Aircraft History
madmike
Posts: 156
Joined: August 2nd, 2010, 4:02 pm

Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

#107 Post by madmike »

In this site there is, undoubtedly, a PPA drawn by Little Bird, with credit of another guy.

https://www.deviantart.com/nascimenttob ... -804655958
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

#109 Post by eswube »

homeSniper wrote: May 4th, 2020, 7:50 am Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
(...)
I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them
Indeed, I considered that eventuality during upload, but in the end I don't share Your opinion. Many of them in literature are described as simply "patrol boats/craft" (of course line between PC/PB and FACG is rather blurry), and some of them are definitely not fast.
homeSniper
Posts: 32
Joined: November 27th, 2017, 10:15 am

Re: Incorrectly Placed Images

#110 Post by homeSniper »

eswube wrote: May 4th, 2020, 6:14 pm
homeSniper wrote: May 4th, 2020, 7:50 am Those in Real Designs / China / Patrol Vessel:
(...)
I think "Coastal Warfare >> Gun Fast Attack Craft" would be a better classification for them
Indeed, I considered that eventuality during upload, but in the end I don't share Your opinion. Many of them in literature are described as simply "patrol boats/craft" (of course line between PC/PB and FACG is rather blurry), and some of them are definitely not fast.
In China, those ships are officially called “护卫艇”, could be translated as "escort boat" or "small corvette". Due to lacking destroyers and frigates, those small ships were actually major combat resource of most Chinese costal defence fleets in about 1950-1970, not just patrol vessels. This is why I think they should be classified as "Costal Warfare". Only Type 62-1G can be an exception, as it is designed as a patrol boat.
For Type 55A and Type 62 series, FACG is OK, they are fast. For Type 52A/53A/54A and the Japanese gunboat, indeed they're not fast enough, maybe just call them "Gunboats" would be fine

http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/8390 this one has wrong picture, No.808 should be a Type 53A. but the picture is No.517, a Type 52A
Post Reply