Shipbucket

Stupid question, why is this here and not Shipbucket proper?

klagldsf wrote:Stupid question, why is this here and not Shipbucket proper?

I'm tired of comments about the standards shipbucket

klagldsf wrote:Stupid question, why is this here and not Shipbucket proper?

If you read every comment it'll become clear..

But still I do love this drawing anyway!

Wasn't the Hindenberg the only BC with a tripod?

JLDogg wrote:Wasn't the Hindenberg the only BC with a tripod?

Nope, even the Baden and the Bayern got one!

Why draw fine drawings fitting nearly 90% of SB standards without trying to fullfill 100%?
... And this isn't a stupid question!

Lazer_one wrote:Why draw fine drawings fitting nearly 90% of SB standards without trying to fullfill 100%?
... And this isn't a stupid question!

Sorry. Repeat the question please. I'm not sure I understand correctly.

Your drawings are very good and , in order to fulfill SB standards, it would be necessary a very small effort.
Why you are not doing this final step?

Lazer_one wrote:Your drawings are very good and , in order to fulfill SB standards, it would be necessary a very small effort.
Why you are not doing this final step?

Maybe. But some of the nuances SB standards I do not like. Such as the color of a railing, "double black lines" and other. And I just do not like standards and restrictions. Individuality is lost.

Very nice 3d graphics (Marsden Samuel 3d.warships)
Seydlitz