you get also that stability issue, by removing the old powerplant, you need to add more weight far down in the ship.
But if the engine is in better shape than we think... then a gas solution is doable, but don't know on that scale, The Norwegian Oslo class used Gas to power it's turbines...
SS United States to Sail Again?!
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: SS United States to Sail Again?!
Sixty year old turbines? Won't those have to be opened up and bladΓ© inspected? I'm asking because I'm not sure if there is any wear issue or metal fatigue involved that should be of concern.heuhen wrote:you get also that stability issue, by removing the old powerplant, you need to add more weight far down in the ship.
But if the engine is in better shape than we think... then a gas solution is doable, but don't know on that scale, The Norwegian Oslo class used Gas to power it's turbines...
As for diesels, the old 1920s turbo electrics the Americans used were very heavy. Their Diesels were not as light as the German Diesels (or as good) either. I agree with you that ballast would be a strong issue of worry as well as the work spaces.
Re: SS United States to Sail Again?!
There are some fairly accurate plans online for the ship - and based on the statements she doesn't have to stay as fast as she was, just stay faster than QM2.
πππππππ- π»π πͺπππππππ πππ
ππ πΊππππ