SUSA
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: SUSA
Thanks ezgo & Adam. To clarify this a bit: He3 might be a good solution but I was thinking more like liquid hydrogen, so its nuclear thermal propulsion. It's quite old concept and therefore should be reliable and probably affordable; and also tested by NASA, as far as I know.
If the propellant is not enough (can't calulate it since I'm not a ... ehhhh... well... a rocket scientist) there is possibility to launch some beforehand to Mars orbit (1.stage). Also added some radiators.
Still scifi but as plausible as I can get
If the propellant is not enough (can't calulate it since I'm not a ... ehhhh... well... a rocket scientist) there is possibility to launch some beforehand to Mars orbit (1.stage). Also added some radiators.
Still scifi but as plausible as I can get
Re: SUSA
Loving these
Hey, it's gotta be 5 o'clock somewhere...
Currently working on:
The October War, 27-10-1962 (apparently forever);
"Saxonverse" alt-UK;
Federation of the Channel Islands AU;
Republic of Yopur & Andaman;
some sort of overarching AU;
Regaining my sanity.
Currently working on:
The October War, 27-10-1962 (apparently forever);
"Saxonverse" alt-UK;
Federation of the Channel Islands AU;
Republic of Yopur & Andaman;
some sort of overarching AU;
Regaining my sanity.
Re: SUSA
Regarding the launch escape system, I would prefer a "pusher" LAS using integral engines instead of a "tractor" LAS that is jettisoned in flight because the "pusher" LAS, being integrated into the spacecraft, allows for escape during the entire orbital ascent phase. That's why Boeing's CST-100 and SpaceX's Dragon 2 space capsules use "pusher" LAS. For your spaceplane's LAS, I suggest you take a look at the Sierra Nevada Corporation Dream Chaser lifting-body spaceplane.
Re: SUSA
very good spacebucket