Shipbucket

That's because they were posted a year ago! and Majhost went down the toilet leaving a lot of broken images.

a couple of sheets don't show up

I've been working for the past few months on a series of big FD scale aircraft weapons sheets. My aim is to include as much as I can find references for. I'm currently organizing the weapons by type (AAM, bombs, etc) but I could also do by country if people would rather see that.

@Kilomuse: nice to hear that you working on such a sheet I think it's better to organize them by weapon type (may you like to add the country to the weapon itself...) looking forward to see them finished

I would also love to see that part sheet and as many parts will be used by multiple nation you may as well have them by type (but built/used by info and dates would also help )

Hello again

Kilomuse wrote:I've been working for the past few months on a series of big FD scale aircraft weapons sheets. My aim is to include as much as I can find references for. I'm currently organizing the weapons by type (AAM, bombs, etc) but I could also do by country if people would rather see that.

Maybe you have some use for these. Some are also drawn by others, just choose the best, no offence taken



Greetings
GD

Wow GD, thanks!

Guys, can we see these parts sheets again? A lot on the first page are missing.

I'm surprised no big FD scale air weapons sheet has been created. Has anyone compiled one?

I have been working on huge FD air weapons and stores project for the past year. I've collected and drawn hundreds of items, but I'm having trouble organizing them into sheets. The sheer number of tiny drawings makes it hard to present them in a clean and logical manner. So far, I have separate sheets for AAMs, air/ground and air/ship missiles, electronic pods, bombs and rockets, nukes & torpedoes and naval weapons. Any suggestions or examples to follow?

Just post them up! My sheets are messy. We can make it a group project to organize.

IMO, parts sheets don't need to be absurdly organized and perfect. Just as long as the most recent, accurate version is represented.

My suggestion would be to separate the weapons the way you've done it (AAMs, air-to-ground, anti-ship missiles, electronic pods, bombs and rockets, nukes & torpedoes, naval weapons) and then separate the sheets into NATO and Russian where necessary.