Page 2 of 5
Re: Comintern AU FD revisited
Posted: April 7th, 2014, 5:55 pm
by Portsmouth Bill
Oh yes, this is another very interesting concept. I like the idea but not sure about welding all those disparate ethnic groups together...unless...of course...coercion!
Re: Comintern AU FD revisited
Posted: April 24th, 2014, 10:58 am
by Gollevainen
Re: Comintern AU FD revisited
Posted: April 24th, 2014, 11:00 am
by Gollevainen
Re: Comintern AU FD revisited
Posted: April 24th, 2014, 11:01 am
by Gollevainen
Re: Comintern AU FD revisited
Posted: April 25th, 2014, 8:29 am
by eswube
Nice.
Re: Comintern AU FD revisited
Posted: April 25th, 2014, 3:26 pm
by Rowdy36
These are all fantastic!
Re: Comintern AU FD revisited
Posted: April 25th, 2014, 8:46 pm
by apdsmith
Hi Gollevainen,
A quick query - is the propellor shaft on the T-4 'Booklet' at an angle? It's just that, looking at it, the prop seems at an angle, so unless it's mounted swashplate-like on the shaft (and I don't think that's good for the prop?) or I'm looking at it wrong something's a little amiss...
Ad
Re: Comintern AU FD revisited
Posted: April 25th, 2014, 8:50 pm
by Colosseum
Excellent stuff!
Re: Comintern AU FD revisited
Posted: April 26th, 2014, 12:34 am
by klagldsf
apdsmith wrote:Hi Gollevainen,
A quick query - is the propellor shaft on the T-4 'Booklet' at an angle? It's just that, looking at it, the prop seems at an angle, so unless it's mounted swashplate-like on the shaft (and I don't think that's good for the prop?) or I'm looking at it wrong something's a little amiss...
Ad
It is not, it's an allusion created by the blade angles.
BTW all of these are based either on real Russian or (mostly) Chinese concepts.
Re: Comintern AU FD revisited
Posted: April 26th, 2014, 6:23 am
by Gollevainen
yes, its "allusion" as Klag said.
And these are mostly chinese this time, no russians involved