Visby Class

Post any drawings that are not one of the official Shipbucket formats here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Mabuse1
Posts: 26
Joined: October 26th, 2012, 10:17 am

Re: Visby Class

#11 Post by Mabuse1 »

Ok, so I made some minor changes, added a coat of arms... hope you like it!

Image

I think the other Visby-versions will be postponed by now. There is not much information about it, think it would be very speculative... But I guess I will do them in the future anyway :-)
Mabuse's Work
Real World:
Fictional:
User avatar
KimWerner
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Visby Class

#12 Post by KimWerner »

It's a shame you save your drawings in jpg format. Do you have the drawing of the badge for HSwMS Härnösund in PNG or GIF format?
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms
User avatar
Mabuse1
Posts: 26
Joined: October 26th, 2012, 10:17 am

Re: Visby Class

#13 Post by Mabuse1 »

Mabuse's Work
Real World:
Fictional:
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: Visby Class

#14 Post by heuhen »

that RHIB or the ROV area I don't remember just now, is where the RBS will be. I it is build to be interchangeable. (a type of flex system) Just like on the Skjold class. Skjold class is now mounted with NSM, but when needed the NSM can be removed to give space for RIB for special forces, but also for other type of equipment.

The AGM launcher is most likely a totally different type than the normal AAW missile, my bet is that they haven't finished the development of it because of cost.

the circles is windows(portholes) (Swedish people is weird sometimes!)

The other thing have Thiel already told...
Gonzo
Posts: 21
Joined: October 15th, 2012, 8:22 pm

Re: Visby Class

#15 Post by Gonzo »

Fantastic looking ship. With the VLS system, is that something that they are going to fit later, or an optional system that might never get fitted. The ships would seem t be a lot more useful if they had some AAW ability other than the 57mm.
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Visby Class

#16 Post by Thiel »

Alectro and Umkhonto have been cancelled.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
moxica
Posts: 155
Joined: August 12th, 2010, 12:48 am
Location: Middle part of Sweden

Re: Visby Class

#17 Post by moxica »

Very nice drawing of a good looking ship. It is a pity thou that our military seems to lack understanding about how to make a budget that works. Someone might need to teach them that if you have 5 apples you can only eat 5 apples and not plan to eat 6-7 and hope you will get that
User avatar
KHT
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm

Re: Visby Class

#18 Post by KHT »

More like a pity the government seem to lack an understanding that the navy should get it's 7 apples. ;)
dc1
Posts: 59
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 4:28 pm

Re: Visby Class

#19 Post by dc1 »

KHT wrote:More like a pity the government seem to lack an understanding that the navy should get it's 7 apples. ;)
Specially when the need is 8 apples 6 oranges and 4 bananas :(
User avatar
KHT
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm

Re: Visby Class

#20 Post by KHT »

So... Corvettes(Visby class)(Apples), Frigates(Orange), and subs(Bananas)? Sounds good! :mrgreen:
Post Reply