Shipbucket

D: My tail surfaces. It is getting there, the nose profile still seems a bit odd (and lacking an IRST sensor).

How about now?

As fair as I can see it seems reasonable enough. FYI the missiles are kinda old to be using on what looks like a 4.5 / 5th gen fighter.

I thought the Alamo and Adder had a longer reach than western missiles though?

Actually, do you know if it's possible for the Irbis-E N035 to guide western munitions with some tweaking?

Also, has anyone got some landing gear for an aircraft like this?

Well R-27 isn't going to lend itself to internal carriage if you do go down that route. R-77 has the ramjet and various seeker variants (proposed and existing) so that's range covered. I'm not sure regarding the IRST but I guess it'd be the actual mission computers for integration of systems so I imagine it's possible...

Tripleposting sin !!! Aster my child, you have sinned.

Also while I'm here. This and This should be of use to you.

^ Thanks, but my mathematics aren't nearly good enough to practically apply much of that to my drawings. ...Hence why I largely kept to Su-27/J-10/PAK-FA/Su-35/F-35/F-22/F-15 airframe type things. I'm appreciate the input, and I've saved those to look at later, but I really didn't want that level of detail for a practical application to my drawing (it's a moot point as I couldn't do it anyway).

In any case, has anyone got any landing gear that would be suitable for my bird? I can't find any suitable stuff in the FD scale vehicles threads...