Page 2 of 4

Re: ROKS Dokdo (LPX)

Posted: September 24th, 2010, 9:45 am
by Portsmouth Bill
Yes, it is the undue length of the hull forward that is the main problem. Also, the superstructure appears somewhat squat; but as Mike says, with some further work it can be resolved; and maybe a full hull would be a good idea?

Re: ROKS Dokdo (LPX)

Posted: September 24th, 2010, 11:37 am
by MC Spoilt B'stard
ill try to do my very best this weekend for an update. i tried to make the hull as good as i could for first , now i will make it try to make it better.

thanks for the comments on the ship.
planed update : september 26th 2010

Re: ROKS Dokdo (LPX)

Posted: September 24th, 2010, 7:57 pm
by klagldsf
Portsmouth Bill wrote:Yes, it is the undue length of the hull forward that is the main problem. Also, the superstructure appears somewhat squat; but as Mike says, with some further work it can be resolved; and maybe a full hull would be a good idea?
The problem isn't that the hull is too long, the problem is that the superstructure went through the dry cycle too long.

Re: ROKS Dokdo (LPX)

Posted: September 26th, 2010, 3:20 pm
by MC Spoilt B'stard
As promised the sunday september 26th update: This time i didn't make it alone , because 2 know alot more then one and 2 can do more then one.

Image

Underwater hull will be made by acelanceloet.

Re: ROKS Dokdo (LPX)

Posted: September 26th, 2010, 3:25 pm
by Portsmouth Bill
Its looking better already.

Re: ROKS Dokdo (LPX)

Posted: September 26th, 2010, 8:39 pm
by Vossiej
It looks like it needs some more work near the bridge. For these designs you can probably get some help from the Hyƫga class.

Re: ROKS Dokdo (LPX)

Posted: October 2nd, 2010, 2:20 pm
by MC Spoilt B'stard
The best update untill now:
Image

Re: ROKS Dokdo (LPX)

Posted: October 2nd, 2010, 3:35 pm
by EnrFe
Great job ;)

Re: ROKS Dokdo (LPX)

Posted: October 2nd, 2010, 7:16 pm
by Colombamike
deleted

Re: ROKS Dokdo (LPX)

Posted: October 2nd, 2010, 7:22 pm
by acelanceloet
you forget one thing: the photo is slightly turned. most of the things you say aren't correct, just because the picture is a bit off.
the flight deck railings are turned down, as they should be when there are heli's on the deck.
the size is correct.
you are right about the vehicle door and some small parts on the bridge, the other parts are right.