belowdeck parts

[acelanceloet]

yep, it works. one question, not really a belowdeck part, do you have anything on the magazine? and were the torpedo tubes still operational?
(and could you show the mounting deck level with an red or black line for clarity, please?)

[NickD]

As i know, torpedo tubes never used on Halland class. They were theoretically operational, but never loaded. Same as taiwanese ASROC's About missile loadouts, i suppose no magazine or reloads exists. Missiles are too big, and it seems there is no place for even for storage, not to mention loading systems(cant see any signs of magazines and load systems on detailed photos). But i didnt found anything written about that, so this is my conclusion only.

[acelanceloet]

so these missiles were loaded and unloaded in port only? interesting......

[Rhade]

Soooo... if they don't have any deck penetration, why this part is in belowdeck parts topic ?

[KHT]

Can see it now, looks really good! *Saved*
I've read that the missiles were stowed in a space just aft of the launch ramp though. However, only one would be launched during combat, due to how long it would take to reload a new missile.

[acelanceloet]

added the RN y.102 powerplant

[Hood]

Nice work on the Y.102 Ace.

[acelanceloet]

added the above LCF powerplant setup.
if anybody has reference for drawings like these last 2, please PM me! ship plans which show the machinery, machinery plans, engine room layouts, even cutaway drawings are welcome.

btw, the first post of this thread is getting more and more unworkable, with huge amounts of parts...... I am thinking of restarting a thread, or finding some other way to organise it.......... any thoughts on that are welcome, as I cannot figure out what would be best

[heuhen]

from the web (It's all from here: http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.c ... j8TfYbxpQE):

some typical machinery arrangements combining diesels, gas turbines and steam turbines (scanned from Friedman's Navies in the Nuclear Age) :

http://images.yuku.com/image/jpeg/d7925 ... 199549.jpg










CODAG plant layout for the German F124 frigate :


CODOG plant layout for the NFR-90 frigate :



CODOG plant layout for the Lupo-class Frigates :

* 2 x LM-2500 Gas Turbines @ 18,650 kW / 25,000 hp each
* 2 x Grandi Motori-Trieste A230-20M Diesel Engines @ 2,910 kW / 3,900 hp each

COGAG plant layout for the Hatakaze-class Destroyers :

2 x RR Spey SM-1A Cruise Gas Turbines @ 9,940 kW / 13,325 hp each
* 2 x RR Olympus TM-3D Boost Gas Turbines @ 18,425 kW / 24,700 hp each

CODOG and COGAG plant layouts for the South Korean KDX-2 and KDX-3 destroyers respectively :

* 2 x GE LM-2500 gas turbines
* 2 x MTU 20V 956 TB92 diesel engines
* 4 x MTU 12V 396 TE54 diesel gensets


* 4 x GE LM-2500 gas turbines
* 3 x RR AG-9140RF gas turbine generators


CODOG plant layout for the F70 frigates :

Aft Generator Room :

1: Diesel Generator DA22
2: Diesel Generator DA21

Diesel Engine Room :

3: Propulsion Diesel Engine
4: Diesel Drive Friction Clutch
5: Main Reduction Gear
6: Port Shaft
7: Gas Turbine Gearbox
8: Propulsion Diesel Engine
9: Starboard Shaft

Gas Turbine Room :

10: Port Gas Turbine
11: Starboard Gas Turbine

Forward Generator Room :

12: Diesel Generator DA12
13: Diesel Generator DA11

Main Equipments :

Propulsion Diesel Engines are Pielstick 16V PA6 280 @ 3,800 kW / 5,200 hp each
Gas Turbines ate Rolls Royce Olympus TM3B @ 19,400 kW / 26,000 hp each
Diesel Gensets are SACM AGO V12CHSR @ 850 kW each

[Rodondo]

btw, the first post of this thread is getting more and more unworkable, with huge amounts of parts...... I am thinking of restarting a thread, or finding some other way to organize it.......... any thoughts on that are welcome, as I cannot figure out what would be best

Maybe either separate it into Weapons, Sensors and Propulsive systems pages.... or by nation (and on each page by era?) pages?