Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Message

YouTube · July 26th, 2013, 12:47 am

Love the long bow...great work, Ashley! Will we see the history of the Panzerschiffen on here soon, possibly?

#832 Post by **heuhen** » July 26th, 2013, 1:17 am

The drawing is awesome crazy, but she wold most likely have the problem of rear top end weight... that mean that she will have a bit funky sea-capability, similar to Nelson but more... If you understand me.

But it's interesting.

#833 Post by **erik_t** » July 26th, 2013, 3:09 am

I think that's a dramatic understatement. It seems unlikely to float at all.

It would probably be instructive to mirror the drawing right to left and compare the two side-by-side. Perhaps also bring in a scaled Kirov, as probably the longest-forecastle warship without large heavy turrets forward.

#834 Post by **acelanceloet** » July 26th, 2013, 8:24 am

ah, another set of drawing which defy the rules of physics.
if it floats (it looks very much overweight) it will break in 2 because of the lack of hull depth and the amount of holes in the hull.

#835 Post by **Dilandu** » August 2nd, 2013, 5:47 pm

Hi everyone! Forgive me that I did not show up for a while... A long time actually, hmmm. Besides, i'm back.

And well, what about... for example... the missile-armed "Battle"-class destroyer (oh, jolly old "Brakemine"...

) for the 1946?

And yes, the position of "Squid" is really not so good. Maybe i'll reposition it later.

#836 Post by **BrentD15** » August 2nd, 2013, 5:56 pm

Dilandu wrote:Hi everyone! Forgive me that I did not show up for a while... A long time actually, hmmm. Besides, i'm back.

And well, what about... for example... the missile-armed "Battle"-class destroyer (oh, jolly old "Brakemine"... ) for the 1946?

And yes, the position of "Squid" is really not so good. Maybe i'll reposition it later.

I think the image is broken.

#837 Post by **Dilandu** » August 2nd, 2013, 6:02 pm

Again?! What the f...antastic things happened with this f...amous system?!

Sigh, it need time to correct. Sorry.

#838 Post by **Dilandu** » August 2nd, 2013, 6:09 pm

WARNING! The "Battle"-class, that served as the basis, were drawn by Portsmouth Bill! I only refitted it.
Sorry, but I work from my phone and simply couldn't place this copyright on the picture itself.

#839 Post by **BrentD15** » August 2nd, 2013, 6:36 pm

Dilandu wrote:WARNING! The "Battle"-class, that served as the basis, were drawn by Portsmouth Bill! I only refitted it.
Sorry, but I work from my phone and simply couldn't place this copyright on the picture itself.

Much better, and very nice.

#840 Post by **Dilandu** » August 2nd, 2013, 6:38 pm

Thanks!

Shipbucket

Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach