Republic of Texas

Post drawings from any Alternate Universe scenario here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
emperor_andreas
Posts: 3908
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact:

Re: Republic of Texas

#321 Post by emperor_andreas »

Nice indeed!
Image
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB
nighthunter
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm

Re: Republic of Texas

#322 Post by nighthunter »

Hey Redhorse, the reason why your PW-8 had cooling issues is lack of the Radiator, lol

Image
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
User avatar
Redhorse
Posts: 499
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:19 am

Re: Republic of Texas

#323 Post by Redhorse »

I guess my base drawing was the wrong version of the aircraft.
Redhorse

Current Projects:
Republic of Texas Navy
FD Scale F-14s
nighthunter
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm

Re: Republic of Texas

#324 Post by nighthunter »

Well the Prototype PW-8 didn't have the radiator, from what I can tell anyway. So, there is the PW-8/P-1/Hawk 1.
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
User avatar
Redhorse
Posts: 499
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:19 am

Re: Republic of Texas

#325 Post by Redhorse »

I like yours better. I'll hang on to that one when it comes time to list the TAF aircraft for 1926-1935.
Redhorse

Current Projects:
Republic of Texas Navy
FD Scale F-14s
nighthunter
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm

Re: Republic of Texas

#326 Post by nighthunter »

Cool! Thanks for the Compliment!
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
User avatar
Redhorse
Posts: 499
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:19 am

Re: Republic of Texas

#327 Post by Redhorse »

In 1928, the Texas Air Force continued upgrading its capabilities with new aircraft. More F-2 fighters were purchased, the Naval Observation Group's 19 SQN received its O-2 floatplanes, and the Bomb Group replaced its older B-1s with new B-2s.

Image

9 Bomber Squadron took delivery of the first aircraft, delivered in the standard green/buff paint scheme common to most TAF planes.

In a few years the strategic mission of the Bomb Group would change from a focus on land-based targets to destruction of an invasion fleet (if the Navy didn't sink it all) and the buff color was replaced with a sea-blue.
Redhorse

Current Projects:
Republic of Texas Navy
FD Scale F-14s
emperor_andreas
Posts: 3908
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact:

Re: Republic of Texas

#328 Post by emperor_andreas »

Nice!
Image
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB
User avatar
Redhorse
Posts: 499
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:19 am

Re: Republic of Texas

#329 Post by Redhorse »

In 1929, the Texas Navy replaced its oldest submarines with four new units, the S-14 class:
Image

The S-14s continued the doctrinal shift away from harbor defense and coastal patrol when the S-9 class was developed in 1922. The twenty-year old S-3s were placed in reserve, with one boat retained by the submarine school for training and the other three for spare parts.

Built by Electric Boat in the United States, the S-14s were the largest submarines yet built for the Texas Navy. They were the first boats built with double-hulls and stern torpedo tubes. They were 274' long, and displaced nearly 1200 tons. Range was a whopping 10,000nm at 10 knots, enabling them to keep up with the fleet if required.

The S-14s were considered to have set the standard for Texas Navy submarine requirements when they were built, and future boats would use roughly the same internal arrangement and design characteristics until the development of more efficient hull forms after WWII.
Redhorse

Current Projects:
Republic of Texas Navy
FD Scale F-14s
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: Republic of Texas

#330 Post by eswube »

Nice additions, though the submarine looks bit bare on upper hull and sail details.
Post Reply