Planebucket Discussion Thread

Post Shipbucket parts sheets here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
GLACIESFIRE
Posts: 663
Joined: November 1st, 2010, 2:17 pm
Location: Back in Italy...

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#721 Post by GLACIESFIRE »

I will think about it... Actually I have a project in mind... ;-)
TimothyC
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact:

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#722 Post by TimothyC »

I'd like to thank Glaciesfire for some amazing work, and for using a livery that was easy to convert into the RGB format:
The 737MAX family:
Image

And the 787 family:
Image
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
TimothyC
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact:

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#723 Post by TimothyC »

Ladies and Gents, for the first time ever,
2707-300 in SB scale:
Image

Wheels need work, but just removing them is also an option.

:mrgreen:

Edit: if any of you use this with livery, remember that the majority of the livery should be white.
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
APDAF
Posts: 1508
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:42 am

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#724 Post by APDAF »

It's a bit too bent for my liking.
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#725 Post by Thiel »

It's a real prototype, deal with it.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
GLACIESFIRE
Posts: 663
Joined: November 1st, 2010, 2:17 pm
Location: Back in Italy...

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#726 Post by GLACIESFIRE »

WOW!!!!! O_o
APDAF
Posts: 1508
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:42 am

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#727 Post by APDAF »

Thiel wrote: It's a real prototype, deal with it.
A friend of mine used to have a model of one and it was not that bent.
Although it might be due to the limitations of the scale.
TimothyC
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact:

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#728 Post by TimothyC »

APDAF wrote:
Thiel wrote: It's a real prototype, deal with it.
A friend of mine used to have a model of one and it was not that bent.
Although it might be due to the limitations of the scale.
Was it specifically a model of the Boeing 2707-300?

The tail curvature on the -200 was less, as was the curvature on the L-2000.

Also, how about you get me something that can go in the archive on the site?
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#729 Post by klagldsf »

There were so many design studies done that throughout its development a model could've been released to an obsolete design.

It was originally supposed to be a much more simple and arguably practical aircraft:

http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/ ... 00377.html
User avatar
odysseus1980
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#730 Post by odysseus1980 »

This 1964 design resembles somewhat the later Rockwell B-1,but with different tail.
Post Reply