Planebucket Discussion Thread
Moderator: Community Manager
-
- Posts: 663
- Joined: November 1st, 2010, 2:17 pm
- Location: Back in Italy...
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
I will think about it... Actually I have a project in mind...
Welcome to my Kingdom!!!
( http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8293 )
( http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8293 )
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
I'd like to thank Glaciesfire for some amazing work, and for using a livery that was easy to convert into the RGB format:
The 737MAX family:
And the 787 family:
The 737MAX family:
And the 787 family:
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Ladies and Gents, for the first time ever,
2707-300 in SB scale:
Wheels need work, but just removing them is also an option.
Edit: if any of you use this with livery, remember that the majority of the livery should be white.
2707-300 in SB scale:
Wheels need work, but just removing them is also an option.
Edit: if any of you use this with livery, remember that the majority of the livery should be white.
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
It's a bit too bent for my liking.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
It's a real prototype, deal with it.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
-
- Posts: 663
- Joined: November 1st, 2010, 2:17 pm
- Location: Back in Italy...
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
WOW!!!!! O_o
Welcome to my Kingdom!!!
( http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8293 )
( http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8293 )
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
A friend of mine used to have a model of one and it was not that bent.Thiel wrote: It's a real prototype, deal with it.
Although it might be due to the limitations of the scale.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Was it specifically a model of the Boeing 2707-300?APDAF wrote:A friend of mine used to have a model of one and it was not that bent.Thiel wrote: It's a real prototype, deal with it.
Although it might be due to the limitations of the scale.
The tail curvature on the -200 was less, as was the curvature on the L-2000.
Also, how about you get me something that can go in the archive on the site?
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
There were so many design studies done that throughout its development a model could've been released to an obsolete design.
It was originally supposed to be a much more simple and arguably practical aircraft:
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/ ... 00377.html
It was originally supposed to be a much more simple and arguably practical aircraft:
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/ ... 00377.html
- odysseus1980
- Posts: 3607
- Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
- Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
This 1964 design resembles somewhat the later Rockwell B-1,but with different tail.