More Adventures in Silliness: BBGHBNX

Post drawings from any Alternate Universe scenario here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

More Adventures in Silliness: BBGHBNX

#1 Post by erik_t »

Many of the longer-tenured members know I've got a certain predilection for large silly stuff, handled (as best I can) in a vaguely rational way. Cost-no-object giant deathboats, things like that.

Welp, here we go again. The one constraint this time: new Panamax absolute lock dimensions: 1400 x 180.5 x 60 feet.

Image

Image

Springsharp was used in these loose calculations where appropriate. Note nice fat stern balances the generally aft-heavy superstructure, which is nice and narrow. Without actually doing any math, I am optimistic re: weight and balance. Nice deep hull, heavy reactors, lots of armor... and frankly not enough of the systems are publicly defined to really have a good guess.



BBGX-2015 (associated with -109 and later)
New Panamax, aim for say 1350ft LOA x 172.5ft BWL x 50ft D-DWL


Dimensions
  • Length: ......................1379 ft OA / 1351 ft WL
  • Beam: .........................168.5ft OA / 166.5ft WL
  • Draught: .....................50ft normal / 46ft light / 53ft FL
  • Displacement:............. 162400t normal
Machinery
  • 2 reactors, 160 MWelec each
  • SSTG: 5 LM1600 SSTG, 12MWelec each
  • 4 screws, integrated electric propulsion, 335000 SHP, 32 knots FL
  • Full propulsive power is 78% of total nominal nuclear plant
  • 10 4000shp Voith-Schneider units, retractable
Electronics/Combat Systems
Radar
  • X-band AESA (4x 12x12ft), beam narrowness 3x (vs. SPY-1A)
  • ..........(6x 8x8ft), beam narrowness 2x (vs. SPY-1), four at 45deg elev.
  • S-band AESA (4x 24x24ft), beam narrowness 2x
  • 1.5m-λ AESA (4x 50x23ft, 20x9 element), beam narrowness 0.28x, 0.128x
  • L-band AESA (4x2 15x2.5ft), common to EV-22 radar-dorito
  • ..........Also serves as T/R for IFF
  • Dispersed APG-81
  • Stupid Mega Death Aegis combat system
  • Distributed X/Ku-band EAPS search/track radar (PDF warning)
Electrooptic/Infrared Sonar
  • 21HS-3ER (notional 24'Dx10'H 3.5khz array extrapolated from St. Norman)
  • SQQ-89 fixed panels (67'x12' (2x2-size) per side)
  • 21HS-13 x5 (notional 3'Dx2'H 13khz array)
  • HF Broadband Sonar Subsystem (three tall/wide bow out-facing)
  • 3 towed array sonar ports with 6x winches (eg 3x SQR-TB-33 + 3x MFTA)
  • 8x Nixie ready-stream ports with 8x winches
  • Thrown A-size passive/active sonobuoys from 155mm glide-rocket, with a presumed range well in excess of 15nmi.
Comms
  • Dispersed phased-array VHF/UHF comms and ESM (Thales ICAS (PDF warning))
  • EHF/SHF/UHF phased-array SATCOM
  • Paired CEC sets
  • HF behind bandpass covers (14' AS-3771B/U, Tx/Rx 4-30 Mhz + Rx VLF/LF/MF)
  • Extensible VHF/UHF/HF
  • ..........HF and below
  • ....................V-33070 74ft Whip (100 khz-30 Mhz) (3x)
  • ..........VHF/UHF
  • ....................VMB-3512-N 141” (30-512 Mhz) (6x)
  • ....................VMB-11512-N 26” (115-512 Mhz) (4x)
ESM/ECM
  • Classic Outboard/Combat DF (COBLU)
  • ..........Passive rangefinding via curvature and/or bearing on 1050ft beam
  • ....................baseline (sub-baselines 75ft, 75ft, 260ft)
  • ..........Stern baseline 260ft
  • New AIEWS (dispersed)
  • Rx antennas 4x2ft, 5.5x3ft, 2.5x1.5ft, 1.5x1.5ft
  • Dispersed wideband jammers (3x2.5ft)
  • Dispersed L/P/UHF/VHF jammers (6.5x4.5ft)
  • Dispersed DIRCM (AAQ-24 mod)
  • 16 Ultra-RBOC blocks (8”x6 each)
  • Jammers, etc. from 155mm rockets
  • Big Nulka from small VLS
Armament
  • 36 8x75' VLS (LGM-118 inclusive)
  • 512 PVLS (32”x27.5', up to 13500lb, 8-cell launcher 192”x144”x32'). One imagines a full-bore SM-3, a full-bore large Tomahawk replacement, a scramjet AShM, a Super-Sea-Lance, a long-and-narrow quadpack SM-ER, nine-pack PAC-3 and ESSM.... these are intentionally not well defined.
  • 320 10”x150” PVLS (sized for Big Nulka, ESSM, RAM-II, etc)
  • 2 1.8m laser directors
  • 4 1.2m laser directors
  • 2x2 280mm/50 Big-AGS
  • 4x1 5/62 medium-weight (40rpm) with 2x155mm rocket (180RPM, drum of sonobuoy/chaff/flare/HE-frag). Note similar 5" rocket-gun was tested on A1D Skyraider in the 1950s.
  • 8x CIWS (4x 57mm + 24x RAM-II/cmd + EAPS search/track + EO/IR)
  • 8x6 retractable Polyphem-S with on-mount EO/IR
  • 6x2 GAU-12U with own search/track/gunlay
  • 6x crew-served positions (eg 15.5mm+Mk19)
  • 2x3 60x20” Limbothings (1500lb, vertical load)
  • 8x3 30”x30' TT for long torpedoes (6000kg, 30”x25', 750kg warhead), 5' long 2000kg DCs (DIE, WAKES)
  • 10x12 8x120” TT for Anti-Torpedo Torpedo
  • 12 x 100 QUICK KILL active protective system. Bigger, say 4.5”x4" in a 6”-on-center matrix
Craft
  • Aircraft: 370x115x25ft hangar, 140x60x16ft hangar, deck strengthened for most arbitrary of Joint Heavy Lift
  • Various spares, etc: 220x115x9ft space
  • Well deck: (220x60x31ft) (2 LCAC or one LCU)
  • Vehicle deck: (400x115x16ft)
  • Cargo spaces: (80x115x9ft, five decks)
  • Aviation Magazine: (15x100x9ft x6, three decks)
  • 4 beam launch derricks (up to 9m RHIB or RMS)
  • 2 stern boat ramps (up to 11m RHIB)
  • 1 stern Mark V ramp
  • 4 50ft utility boats from beam davits

Notional Aircraft
  • 12 FAV-22
  • 4 V-22
  • 4 EV-22
  • 12 A160T
  • This fully populates dedicated aircraft hangars without intruding on vehicle spaces
Passive Defenses
  • Citadel: 845' L
  • Main Belt: 20' high, top edge 11' above DWL, 10” thick, 7.5deg roll to expose lower edge at FL, 5.5deg roll to expose at DWL
  • Lower Belt: 15' high, Top edge 5' below DWL, 5” thick
  • Splinter Belt: 50' high, 845' L, 3” thick
  • Deck: 6” thick
  • TDS: 21.5-28' deep (liquid-loaded with JP5)
  • Multiple Bottom: 6' thick
  • LO backangle: 10deg back from vertical below gunwale (61' above DWL), 15deg back from vertical above gunwale
  • Total armor weight: ~25% from Springsharp
One more note (thanks Timothy) - if I see any of these (non-factual) parts or pieces or anything else used without permission in any NationStates inanity, or hear about someone doing such, I will banhammer the ever-living shit out of them. So don't do that. You may feel free to ask permission. Expect the answer to be 'no'.
Erusia Force
Posts: 440
Joined: January 18th, 2012, 9:09 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: More Adventures in Silliness: BBGHBNX

#2 Post by Erusia Force »

Very impressive Erik, very impressive.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: More Adventures in Silliness: BBGHBNX

#3 Post by heuhen »

And ... He's ... back!

I remember first time I saw one of his megas ship! I was like Wow, I have to try that one day!

But the work and know how that have been put in this one is impressive.
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: More Adventures in Silliness: BBGHBNX

#4 Post by klagldsf »

Mighty impressive, goes without saying.

While I'm at it I'm formally requesting permission to use parts. I don't know what kind of parts I'm going to use right now - except, believe it or not, the basketball court.
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: More Adventures in Silliness: BBGHBNX

#5 Post by eswube »

Fantastic drawing... of an awful ship. :lol:
Magnificent work!
Hood
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: More Adventures in Silliness: BBGHBNX

#6 Post by Hood »

Impressive and nicely drawn (comprehensive multi-views), but its leaving me feeling rather flat.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
User avatar
KHT
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm

Re: More Adventures in Silliness: BBGHBNX

#7 Post by KHT »

Crazy as it is, I really like it! :D
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: More Adventures in Silliness: BBGHBNX

#8 Post by Thiel »

It's certainly impressive, but I can't quite figure out what it's for.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: More Adventures in Silliness: BBGHBNX

#9 Post by heuhen »

Thiel: What was a BB build for!?!


the only thing I find very funny about this ship, or shall I say, a downgrade on what here capacity and the era she must have been build for. She is carrying Harpoon missile, on this ship it's like equipping a F-35 with hand dropped bombs. I would rather used NSM since USA are hard in the JSM program for developing a Fighter launched variant of the NSM, so why not use NSM on this ship then.
acelanceloet
Posts: 7511
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: More Adventures in Silliness: BBGHBNX

#10 Post by acelanceloet »

actually, IIRC, the USN is developing an follow on for the harpoon, but we are not certain what she will look like.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Post Reply