Grays Harbor Designs

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#621 Post by Thiel »

You really don't want to put a Hazemeyer on the bow. Heapings of seawater + 1940ies electronics = Not a good idea.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
User avatar
jabba
Posts: 1012
Joined: April 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Location: Under your kitchen sink...

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#622 Post by jabba »

Great drawing!
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#623 Post by Zephyr »

Thiel wrote:You really don't want to put a Hazemeyer on the bow. Heapings of seawater + 1940ies electronics = Not a good idea.
umm .... yeah, hadn't considered that element of it. I do believe I'll swap that out for a standard quad mount.

EDIT: image redone
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
ALVAMA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#624 Post by ALVAMA »

That's not a Hazemeyer , but the comment is correct!
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#625 Post by Zephyr »

ALVAMA wrote:That's not a Hazemeyer , but the comment is correct!
I had probably already changed it by the time you saw it. Wasn't much of a task, so I just swapped the hazemeyer out for one less likely to fry the crew whenever a wave comes over the bow. :lol:
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
ALVAMA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#626 Post by ALVAMA »

Zephyr wrote:
ALVAMA wrote:That's not a Hazemeyer , but the comment is correct!
I had probably already changed it by the time you saw it. Wasn't much of a task, so I just swapped the hazemeyer out for one less likely to fry the crew whenever a wave comes over the bow. :lol:
\

haha Okay Okay :lol:
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#627 Post by Thiel »

Zephyr wrote:
Thiel wrote:You really don't want to put a Hazemeyer on the bow. Heapings of seawater + 1940ies electronics = Not a good idea.
umm .... yeah, hadn't considered that element of it. I do believe I'll swap that out for a standard quad mount.

EDIT: image redone
Yeah... That one isn't much better. And it's about five years too early and completely out of sync with the rest of your AA which are all converted 20mm mounts.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#628 Post by Zephyr »

Thiel wrote:
Zephyr wrote:
Thiel wrote:You really don't want to put a Hazemeyer on the bow. Heapings of seawater + 1940ies electronics = Not a good idea.
umm .... yeah, hadn't considered that element of it. I do believe I'll swap that out for a standard quad mount.

EDIT: image redone
Yeah... That one isn't much better. And it's about five years too early and completely out of sync with the rest of your AA which are all converted 20mm mounts.
Got a recomendation for a suitable one? :? What about one of the quad or octuple 2 Pdr mounts, but with newer 40mm instead of the older 2 Pdr's?
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#629 Post by Thiel »

Well, give the timeframe I'd ditch all the converted 20mm mounts. They were cramped and had a dubious service record.
Instead you should decide on one or two type of mountings. Personally I'd go for the USNs Mark 1 Twin since you're using USN directors already.
If you insist on a bow mount I'd go for the Mark 3 Quad.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#630 Post by Zephyr »

Yeah, I was just doing some reading on those on the NavWeaps website, see what I could come up with. Now I just need to find images and/or drawings of them. The US parts sheets, at least those I can find, seem to concentrate more on the modern stuff. I'll work it out somehow.

Thanks.

EDIT: image updated again, this time with all twin mounts, until I can find a suitable quad for the bow. :lol:
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Post Reply