Why? We weren't doing anything illegal and we were some sixty miles outside of US territorial waters anyway so they didn't have jurisdiction anyway.gordo8000 wrote:God help you dude.Thiel wrote:I've been buzzed by one of those. Apparently if you put enough soot in the water it'll look remarkably like an oil spill.
FD scale Aircrafts - Post all your flying objects here
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: FD scale Aircrafts - Post all your flying objects here
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
-
gordo8000
- Posts: 511
- Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
- Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.
Re: FD scale Aircrafts - Post all your flying objects here
You didn't say you were in intnational waters.
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU
Re: FD scale Aircrafts - Post all your flying objects here
Thiel wrote: Why? We weren't doing anything illegal and we were some sixty miles outside of US territorial waters anyway so they didn't have jurisdiction anyway.
Never heard about EEZ (200 Nq), Montego Bay convention nor United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).gordo8000 wrote:You didn't say you were in intnational waters.
We really are OT, sorry.
Je pardonne à tous ceux qui m'ont offensé... mais je garde la liste!
Worklist, FD scale submarines and ships :
- Project 971 "Akula" (80%)
- Project 705 "Alpha" (10%)
- Project 371 (70%)
- Project 1459 (30%)
- Projekt 151 Sassnitz (To be redone)
Worklist, FD scale submarines and ships :
- Project 971 "Akula" (80%)
- Project 705 "Alpha" (10%)
- Project 371 (70%)
- Project 1459 (30%)
- Projekt 151 Sassnitz (To be redone)
-
Gollevainen
- Posts: 4715
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: FD scale Aircrafts - Post all your flying objects here
Here's the corrected An-2
And fresh Il-14P
And fresh Il-14P
Re: FD scale Aircrafts - Post all your flying objects here
Very nice Gollevainen.
But I will be pain in the... (You know what) once again.
Last time I checked, in the undercarriage of An-2, the struts were on the inner side of the wheels, not on the outer, and both An-2 and Il-14 had wheels, not eggs.
Maybe this would be useful.
But I will be pain in the... (You know what) once again.
Last time I checked, in the undercarriage of An-2, the struts were on the inner side of the wheels, not on the outer, and both An-2 and Il-14 had wheels, not eggs.
Maybe this would be useful.
-
Gollevainen
- Posts: 4715
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: FD scale Aircrafts - Post all your flying objects here
The Il-14's wheel is "artistic liberty, since the size of the wheel (and the shape) at those pixels really don't allow circle form. An-2's carriage I drew according to the orginal building plans that you can find on web by bit of search.
-
ALVAMA
Re: FD scale Aircrafts - Post all your flying objects here
Whyme, don't you need to comment on the credit title?Gollevainen wrote:
[img]http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc31 ... vAn-2T.png
[img]http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc31 ... Il-14P.png
Re: FD scale Aircrafts - Post all your flying objects here
While I am aware, that arguing with Site Admin is a very poor policy choice, I'll dare to keep my opinion.
1) these had to be some very weird plans of An-2. Maybe the picture You used as a reference was deliberately showing only one "leg" of the landing gear (the opposite to the viewer, further away) to show it's construction that would be invisible on a side view with both "legs".
If You look at some of the photos here:
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... ers.net%2F
You'll see that struts are definitely not on the outer side of the wheels.
2) My point was that those Your wheels had different number of pixels in height and different in width, esp. in the inner (metal) part of the Il-14's main gear.
That picture I've uploaded is, I believe, a representation closer to reality - free of charge.
1) these had to be some very weird plans of An-2. Maybe the picture You used as a reference was deliberately showing only one "leg" of the landing gear (the opposite to the viewer, further away) to show it's construction that would be invisible on a side view with both "legs".
If You look at some of the photos here:
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... ers.net%2F
You'll see that struts are definitely not on the outer side of the wheels.
2) My point was that those Your wheels had different number of pixels in height and different in width, esp. in the inner (metal) part of the Il-14's main gear.
That picture I've uploaded is, I believe, a representation closer to reality - free of charge.
Re: FD scale Aircrafts - Post all your flying objects here
That's why I draw only gear-retracted plane
@ Gollevainen : Can I use your An-2 to make the An-4 (An-2V) ?
@ Gollevainen : Can I use your An-2 to make the An-4 (An-2V) ?
Je pardonne à tous ceux qui m'ont offensé... mais je garde la liste!
Worklist, FD scale submarines and ships :
- Project 971 "Akula" (80%)
- Project 705 "Alpha" (10%)
- Project 371 (70%)
- Project 1459 (30%)
- Projekt 151 Sassnitz (To be redone)
Worklist, FD scale submarines and ships :
- Project 971 "Akula" (80%)
- Project 705 "Alpha" (10%)
- Project 371 (70%)
- Project 1459 (30%)
- Projekt 151 Sassnitz (To be redone)
Re: FD scale Aircrafts - Post all your flying objects here
No, why?ALVAMA wrote:Whyme, don't you need to comment on the credit title?
I asked first and I'm already drawing itCplnew83 wrote:@ Gollevainen : Can I use your An-2 to make the An-4 (An-2V) ?
