Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Post drawings from any Alternate Universe scenario here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#771 Post by acelanceloet »

also, taking into consideration that an single spitfire could kill it (by simply hitting one of the V-1's the entire ship goes boom) and it will give large flashes during the attack.... while you are attacking, which will take at least an hour.....
not to forget that this rebuild looks larger then using the ship as an seaplane carrier or full carrier............
no, I am not sold on design, concept, and usefulnes.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Carthaginian
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#772 Post by Carthaginian »

The reason that US ballistic missiles were so much more accurate than their Soviet counterparts wasn't that they were had better target information, it was that they had better launch point information. The missiles were more accurate because they knew, down to a few yards, the point where they were being launched from, which made it far easier to determine the proper course to their target.

The V-1 had a guidance system which basically consisted of 'Ok, I'm pointing this way- so I go this way!'
If you don't know exactly where you are at the time of launch, it would be absolutely impossible to fire one and hope to hit a reasonably sized county.
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#773 Post by Ashley »

You would be right. If this wasn't the V1M. It is signifcantly faster (about 100 km/h) than its landbased predecessor. And it can be guided by radio signals. So a well hidden agent or submarine would guide the missile on their last mile.
Sure, the signals can get disturbed, the guiding agent or sub could be found. The british services will find out about the new weapon etc etc etc.
This is the first time operation of the V1M in wartime. So a little surprise might be.
Does it make sense now?
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re:

#774 Post by acelanceloet »

Well, I know for certain that my remarks still count, so, IMO, no.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Karle94
Posts: 2135
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#775 Post by Karle94 »

Another reason for the increased accuracy was becasue the Americans had the German scientist working for them, the Soviets had the blueprints. Now guess which is better.
gordo8000
Posts: 511
Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#776 Post by gordo8000 »

Is this version of the V1 powered by a pulse jet like the earlier model?
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#777 Post by Thiel »

Ashley wrote:You would be right. If this wasn't the V1M. It is signifcantly faster (about 100 km/h) than its landbased predecessor. And it can be guided by radio signals. So a well hidden agent or submarine would guide the missile on their last mile.
Sure, the signals can get disturbed, the guiding agent or sub could be found. The british services will find out about the new weapon etc etc etc.
This is the first time operation of the V1M in wartime. So a little surprise might be.
Does it make sense now?
No. The missiles would either have to home in on the radio signal, in which case you'd have to hide the transmitters on board the individual ships or they'd have to be remote controlled which means that the hidden controller will have to know which missile will respond to which frequency, be in a position to see their approach and their target, seek out and perform terminal guidance on a new target every two or so and he'll have to remain undetected for at least 2½ hours while he's radiating for all to see.
And that completely ignores the fact that the Brits were very good at shooting down V1s. Certainly, the extra 100km/h is going to be handicap for them, but since they have two minutes to shoot each one down in I doubt it'll be enough.
In addition, if the war last a year longer then the Gloster Meteor F.4 will be available in substantial numbers.
Karle94 wrote:Another reason for the increased accuracy was becasue the Americans had the German scientist working for them, the Soviets had the blueprints. Now guess which is better.
There's so much wrong with that statement.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
DG_Alpha
Posts: 762
Joined: January 1st, 2012, 7:01 pm
Location: Germany

Re: BC Alvensleben -> Monitor Baldur

#778 Post by DG_Alpha »

Ashley wrote:The concept was well tested with the cruiser Passau and the mobile airfield was the ideal source for a successful conversion.
Speaking of the Passau, I took the liberty of updating the old design a bit, I hope you don't mind:
Image
My worklist
Any help and source material is always welcome.
User avatar
odysseus1980
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#779 Post by odysseus1980 »

My opinion is that the Passau is more plausible from the previous V1M cruiser.
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#780 Post by Thiel »

Neither are workable. They have the same problems, but in the Passau's case it's aggravated by a small ammunition supply. And when you have a CEP measured in tens of miles on a windless day you're going to need a lot ofrounds to hit anything.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Post Reply