Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Post drawings from any Alternate Universe scenario here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#761 Post by Ashley »

denodon wrote:Would they be direct drive or diesel-electric which would allow for cruising and high performance engines?
The Brommy-class CAs were equipped with twelve MAN 9-cylinder V-configuration double acting two-stroke diesel engines that were designed to provide a total of 165,000 shaft horsepower at 250 rpm (geared). The engines were arranged in three sets of four, each of which drove one of three shafts. The shafts each turned a screw that was 4.3 m in diameter. No diesel-electric drive.
Last edited by Ashley on April 25th, 2012, 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

BC Alvensleben -> Transatlantikplattform 'Meerwein'

#762 Post by Ashley »

The 1926 formed german airline Lufthansa had great plans for worldwide routes. Therefor airports, landing strips and fuel stations were needed. The Alvensleven was converted into a floating airfield. Equipped with a landing deck and the brand new arresting cables (german espionage on the RN was successful) the now called Transatlantikplattform 'Meerwein' was given in 1930 to Lufthansa. 1931 the Meerwein was placed on the route Berlin-New York. She was able to service any flying boat (ok, not the Do-X) and special small cargo aircraft with arrestor hook. Two of her three engine rooms contained now gas tanks and spare parts. The hanger was big enough to service even the large flying boats.
After 1938 the era of the longrange aircraft began and transatlantic flights without stop made the floating airfield needless. The blitzkrieg of 1939/40 saw 'Meerwein' untouched but in 1944 with upcoming war rumors Lufthansa gave the 'Meerwein' back to Kriegsmarine where the old battlecruiser was converted for her last mission (keep waiting please).
Image
Last edited by Ashley on April 25th, 2012, 1:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
User avatar
Rhade
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#763 Post by Rhade »

Nice!

Check space under main mast, I see couple of errors. ;)
Image
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#764 Post by denodon »

Ashley wrote: The Brommy-class CAs were equipped with twelve MAN 9-cylinder V-configuration double acting two-stroke diesel engines that were designed to provide a total of 165,000 shaft horsepower at 250 rpm (geared). The engines were arranged in four sets of three, each of which drove one of four shafts. The shafts each turned a screw that was 4.3 m in diameter. No diesel-electric drive.
You mention four shafts here yet before you said they have triple screws, just a niggle.

I'm really loving how the Meerwein looks too.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#765 Post by Ashley »

denodon wrote:
Ashley wrote: The Brommy-class CAs were equipped with twelve MAN 9-cylinder V-configuration double acting two-stroke diesel engines that were designed to provide a total of 165,000 shaft horsepower at 250 rpm (geared). The engines were arranged in four sets of three, each of which drove one of four shafts. The shafts each turned a screw that was 4.3 m in diameter. No diesel-electric drive.
You mention four shafts here yet before you said they have triple screws, just a niggle.
Thanks, corrected.
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#766 Post by denodon »

You're welcome.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#767 Post by Ashley »

Rhade wrote:Nice!

Check space under main mast, I see couple of errors. ;)
Thanks, errors corrected on upper drawing.
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
User avatar
Raxar
Posts: 1407
Joined: August 31st, 2011, 4:49 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#768 Post by Raxar »

Nice!
Worklist

"If people never did silly things nothing intelligent would ever get done." ~Ludwig Wittgenstein
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

BC Alvensleben -> Monitor Baldur

#769 Post by Ashley »

When Lufthansa gave back the ex-BC Alvensleven, now Transatlantikplattform Meerwein, the OKM had to make a decision about the worthy hull. Operation Sealion was to become reality next year and the Kriegsmarine was hastily building ships like never before, older ships were refitted to stand against the so said best navy in the world.
For a refit into a fullscale carrier there was no time, the hull contained only a third of its earlier enginepower. Half of the ship was fitted with a flight deck but the other half would have needed a complete rebuild.
So she was finally converted into a mobile starting platform for V1M missiles, the navalised and enlarged version of the V1. The concept was well tested with the cruiser Passau and the mobile airfield was the ideal source for a successful conversion.
The flightdeck was reduced to a helicopter landingdeck with hanger. The former repair facilites around the lift were removed for more storage. The big single catapult on the foredeck was replaced by two smaller ones. Some aa and directors were added, ready was the missilemonitor 'Baldur'. She was now able to store 60 V1M and every two minutes another pair of the could be fired. The ready-time for a V1M was eight minutes (fix wings, check electronics, carry it from the tracks to the catapult, finaly check, program target, final test and go), twelve could be carried ready.
'Baldur' had the speciol mission to attack the homefleet at Scapa Flow. In the night before the invasion she took position 90 miles east of Scapa Flow, one hour before sunrise the wrecking of homefleet began. Baldur managed to fire all 60 missiles until she was found by RN destroyers. But the ship was abandonded, the destroyers sank just an empty old wreck.
Image
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#770 Post by Thiel »

I'm sorry, but that ship makes no sense.
The V1 could, on a good day with a fixed ramp and known weather parameters, hit a target about the size of London and you're going to use it to hit point targets you can't see, from a location that isn't 100% certain, from a moving deck in the middle of the night?
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Post Reply