NATO ASW Design Challenge

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
jabba
Posts: 1012
Joined: April 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Location: Under your kitchen sink...

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#161 Post by jabba »

acelanceloet wrote:very nice. added to first post. what kind of propulsion system?
Just spotted this...
CODOG; the same or similar to the Bremen class frigate's TB92/LM2500 propulsion.
odysseus1980 wrote:Dortmund class is the better looking of all designs in this thread.Nice work Jabba!
I'm not sure I agree, but thank you for the compliment!
User avatar
LEUT_East
Posts: 923
Joined: December 29th, 2011, 7:27 am
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#162 Post by LEUT_East »

It has been suggested that I enter my Murrumbidgee Class CODAD Frigate HMAS Murrumbidgee (F45) into this post so here goes. Her design is a mixture of USN Knox/Bronstien/Garcia Class and miscellaneous Anglo designs.
Australia, Murrumbidgee Class F45 HMAS Murrumbidgee (1139 15-04-2012).png
There is no "I" in TEAM but there is a ME

Image
______________________
Current Worklist:
Redrawing my entire AU after a long absence from Shipbucket
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#163 Post by acelanceloet »

nice design. just 3 things:
- does it fit in the displacement limits? (it might, it depends on the beam)
- could you post it as external image instead of attachment? that way I can put it in the first post of the thread, right now I have to save and upload the drawing again myself.
- could you give some data (displacement, l*b*h*t, amount and power of the engines, weaponry......)

also, was this ever posted somewhere else in the forum? if so, I seem to have missed it :$
EDIT: found it: it was only posted today, found it after I replied haha

btw, the remark about the attachment is also for nighthunter, I suppose your design is finished?
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
LEUT_East
Posts: 923
Joined: December 29th, 2011, 7:27 am
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#164 Post by LEUT_East »

There is no "I" in TEAM but there is a ME

Image
______________________
Current Worklist:
Redrawing my entire AU after a long absence from Shipbucket
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#165 Post by acelanceloet »

as the attachments are all gone and by that the drawings of leut_east and nighthunter are completely gone, may I ask them for the last time to reupload them externally? ;)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
LEUT_East
Posts: 923
Joined: December 29th, 2011, 7:27 am
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#166 Post by LEUT_East »

Here you go Ace
Image
There is no "I" in TEAM but there is a ME

Image
______________________
Current Worklist:
Redrawing my entire AU after a long absence from Shipbucket
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#167 Post by acelanceloet »

thanks. also added to first post :P we have one nice list of ships now.... just waiting for thiel and nighthunters final drawings now.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#168 Post by acelanceloet »

as the challenge is now open long enough, nighthunter and thiel will have 72 hours counting from now, to repost/finish their designs. I do not want to exclude them from the challenge, so I give some more time...... but after that, no more new drawings can be 'submitted' into the challenge.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#169 Post by Thiel »

Image
Here you go.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#170 Post by acelanceloet »

are there any specs available? (IIRC, they are somewhere in this thread, but I have no time to search them, would it be possible to add them in here?)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Post Reply