heuhen wrote:Type: ASW with ASuW and AAW capability's
Displacement: Approx. 5,000 tons
Length: 396 feet (120.7 meters)
Beam: 52 feet (16 meters)
Drought: max: 22 feet (6.7 meters)
Propulsion:
2-shaft COGOG
2 Rolls-Royce Olympus TM3B high-speed gas turbines (54,000 shp / 40 MW)
2 Rolls-Royce Tyne RM1C cruise gas turbines (9,700 shp / 7.2 MW)
Speed: 31 knots+-
19 knots
Range: 6,000 nmi (11,000 km) at 19 kn; 3,300 nmi (6,100 km) at 31 kn
Complement: 140-280
Armament:
Capability to be equipped with most American and European weapon systems. see drawings bellow.
the standard weapon on them all is
1 * 76mm gun DP
2 * 30mm
2 * 12,7mm
2 * triple torpedo tubes
1 * quad sea sparrow launcher (with reload magazine Oslo class style).
Armor: limited Kevlar splinter protection in critical areas
Aircraft carried: 1+1 × Lynx, depends of mission
The standard with Mk-141 Harpoon on foredeck:
Here with Terne III (Rocket powered depth charges, with space for reload magazine):
ASROC instead for Terne III:
NATO ASW Design Challenge
Moderator: Community Manager
- heuhen
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
- Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
From here: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2833
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
Apparently my previous link didn't work so here it is again;
As I said I'm not sure whether I'm going to continue with this design or scrap it in replacement for something MEKO inspired. Not certain yet.
I really wish the part sheets for sensors and radars gave information as to what weapons they are used for/compatible with. All their names are just jargon that I have no idea what they mean and in many cases what years they are from.
As I said I'm not sure whether I'm going to continue with this design or scrap it in replacement for something MEKO inspired. Not certain yet.
I really wish the part sheets for sensors and radars gave information as to what weapons they are used for/compatible with. All their names are just jargon that I have no idea what they mean and in many cases what years they are from.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
- Clonecommander6454
- Posts: 760
- Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
The ship's hull look pretty nice! But I am not sure about only installing two SSM onboard and any thoughts on having Point Defense Missile like NSSM and Sea Wolf onboard?
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
Looks like a big brother to the Free World Frigate proposal from the 70s. Good Start. For electronics, I can help you when I am more awake.
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
TimothyC wrote:Looks like a big brother to the Free World Frigate proposal from the 70s.
Wow that sucker is small.
edited to address something brought to my attention
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
I'm thinking I might move the Exocets to the foredeck or fit angled launchers somewhere to give a total of four missile tubes.
As for point defense I'm thinking of putting something atop the hangar rood though I'm not sure yet. I'm thinking I might keep it using just Dutch or European systems where possible to keep more in the NATO theme.
As for point defense I'm thinking of putting something atop the hangar rood though I'm not sure yet. I'm thinking I might keep it using just Dutch or European systems where possible to keep more in the NATO theme.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
Here's my design then...
Two variants here, one with hangar and one without. I've gone for a French weapons fit just to be different.
Top views and parts will be updated and corrected at some point. Still very WIP...
Two variants here, one with hangar and one without. I've gone for a French weapons fit just to be different.
Top views and parts will be updated and corrected at some point. Still very WIP...
Last edited by jabba on March 22nd, 2012, 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 7512
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
WIP. more and more parts getting into position...
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
- Clonecommander6454
- Posts: 760
- Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
From here: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2852
Clonecommander6454 wrote:
-
- Posts: 7512
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
both heuhens and clonecommanders fixed in the first post (I suppose that was why this was posted?)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin