NATO ASW Design Challenge

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#101 Post by heuhen »

From here: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2833
heuhen wrote:Type: ASW with ASuW and AAW capability's
Displacement: Approx. 5,000 tons
Length: 396 feet (120.7 meters)
Beam: 52 feet (16 meters)
Drought: max: 22 feet (6.7 meters)

Propulsion:

2-shaft COGOG
2 Rolls-Royce Olympus TM3B high-speed gas turbines (54,000 shp / 40 MW)
2 Rolls-Royce Tyne RM1C cruise gas turbines (9,700 shp / 7.2 MW)

Speed: 31 knots+-
19 knots

Range: 6,000 nmi (11,000 km) at 19 kn; 3,300 nmi (6,100 km) at 31 kn

Complement: 140-280


Armament:

Capability to be equipped with most American and European weapon systems. see drawings bellow.
the standard weapon on them all is

1 * 76mm gun DP
2 * 30mm
2 * 12,7mm
2 * triple torpedo tubes
1 * quad sea sparrow launcher (with reload magazine Oslo class style).


Armor: limited Kevlar splinter protection in critical areas
Aircraft carried: 1+1 × Lynx, depends of mission

The standard with Mk-141 Harpoon on foredeck:
Image

Here with Terne III (Rocket powered depth charges, with space for reload magazine):
Image

ASROC instead for Terne III:
Image
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#102 Post by denodon »

Apparently my previous link didn't work so here it is again;

Image

As I said I'm not sure whether I'm going to continue with this design or scrap it in replacement for something MEKO inspired. Not certain yet.

I really wish the part sheets for sensors and radars gave information as to what weapons they are used for/compatible with. All their names are just jargon that I have no idea what they mean and in many cases what years they are from.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
User avatar
Clonecommander6454
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#103 Post by Clonecommander6454 »

The ship's hull look pretty nice! But I am not sure about only installing two SSM onboard and any thoughts on having Point Defense Missile like NSSM and Sea Wolf onboard?
TimothyC
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact:

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#104 Post by TimothyC »

Looks like a big brother to the Free World Frigate proposal from the 70s. Good Start. For electronics, I can help you when I am more awake.
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#105 Post by klagldsf »

TimothyC wrote:Looks like a big brother to the Free World Frigate proposal from the 70s.
Image
Image

Wow that sucker is small.


edited to address something brought to my attention
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#106 Post by denodon »

I'm thinking I might move the Exocets to the foredeck or fit angled launchers somewhere to give a total of four missile tubes.
As for point defense I'm thinking of putting something atop the hangar rood though I'm not sure yet. I'm thinking I might keep it using just Dutch or European systems where possible to keep more in the NATO theme.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
User avatar
jabba
Posts: 1012
Joined: April 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Location: Under your kitchen sink...

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#107 Post by jabba »

Here's my design then...

Two variants here, one with hangar and one without. I've gone for a French weapons fit just to be different.

Top views and parts will be updated and corrected at some point. Still very WIP...

Image
Last edited by jabba on March 22nd, 2012, 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#108 Post by acelanceloet »

WIP. more and more parts getting into position...
Image
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Clonecommander6454
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#109 Post by Clonecommander6454 »

From here: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2852
Clonecommander6454 wrote:Image
ImageImage
Image
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#110 Post by acelanceloet »

both heuhens and clonecommanders fixed in the first post :P (I suppose that was why this was posted?)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Post Reply