NAF Triden-Class Battleship

This is a forum for newbies and beginners to post their first designs. Please note that this forum is only for Shipbucket and FD scale projects.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
furturewar
Posts: 25
Joined: March 11th, 2012, 6:31 am

NAF Triden-Class Battleship

#1 Post by furturewar »

Okay, I'm new here, so take it easy on me.

Image

The Hull and superstructure is H.Heuser's so credit goes to him for that.

Question: Would there be enough room for the six 18.1 inch turrets or would i have to cut down on them/ Extend the length of the hull.

I'd also like to request some assistance with some tips on how to detail the Superstructure, as I have never been good at nitty-gritty details.
Last edited by furturewar on March 11th, 2012, 7:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Furturewarfare's Worklist:
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Titan-Class Carrier "King"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Objective Global Super-Warship Goliath "Ace of Aces"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Blitzker-Class Guided Missile Destroyer "Knight"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Lancer-Class Guided Missile Cruiser "Bishop"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Aegis-Class ASW/AAW Cruiser "Rook"

"We are the Aces of Aces, We fly high and fight to survive"
~Furturewarfare
Novice
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat

Re: NAF Triden-Class Battleship

#2 Post by Novice »

First let me welcome you aboard, and now for the critique
One , never use JPEG to upload your drawings. Use GIF or PNG instead. If your image hosting site does not support this function use either majhost, imageshack or photobucket.
In my opinion six twin turrets is way too much on the hull. Four turrets is more than enough. Secondary armament looks too modern for a battleship, use something else.
Image Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
User avatar
Clonecommander6454
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm

Re: NAF Triden-Class Battleship

#3 Post by Clonecommander6454 »

Novice wrote:In my opinion six twin turrets is way too much on the hull.
I think that is a 18" Japanese Turret on the Yamato Class. 18 guns is seriously overkill for most circumstances and I recommend more secondaries for a ship this size.
User avatar
Portsmouth Bill
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom

Re: NAF Triden-Class Battleship

#4 Post by Portsmouth Bill »

Yes, welcome aboard :) With the design, the hull is really quite good, so you've got the basics for an interesting design; my advice would be to accept any advice and see what you can develop here.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9109
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: NAF Triden-Class Battleship

#5 Post by heuhen »

She can't carry 6 turrets. when i designed her with 5 turrets, I was designing her to the limit, and had to reduce on armor and engine size. but with 4. turrets you culd increas armor and engines, so she can survive a gunfight easy.
furturewar
Posts: 25
Joined: March 11th, 2012, 6:31 am

Re: NAF Triden-Class Battleship

#6 Post by furturewar »

I do fully understand that 6 18" cannons are overkill, and came here knowing people would "yell" at me for doing so, but thats just how i'm used to making things. A lot of things i've built normally involve over-sized/impractical/overkill Designs, but thats just how I roll.

So would it be possible to Either Lengthen/Widen the Hull to allow the 6 turrets to stand, or is there no chance for them at all?
And for the secondaries, I thought those were the ones used on the Iowa, but maybe not? Anyways, i switched them out for the Mk.32's.

But say I were to Remove the 2 of the turrets, could that open room for say a 12"?
Furturewarfare's Worklist:
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Titan-Class Carrier "King"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Objective Global Super-Warship Goliath "Ace of Aces"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Blitzker-Class Guided Missile Destroyer "Knight"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Lancer-Class Guided Missile Cruiser "Bishop"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Aegis-Class ASW/AAW Cruiser "Rook"

"We are the Aces of Aces, We fly high and fight to survive"
~Furturewarfare
ALVAMA

Re: NAF Triden-Class Battleship

#7 Post by ALVAMA »

The secondary are way too modern, they are 1970 + or something.
furturewar
Posts: 25
Joined: March 11th, 2012, 6:31 am

Re: NAF Triden-Class Battleship

#8 Post by furturewar »

Really? I got them from the WWII USN Parts Sheet....
Ehh, I'll switch 'em.
Furturewarfare's Worklist:
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Titan-Class Carrier "King"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Objective Global Super-Warship Goliath "Ace of Aces"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Blitzker-Class Guided Missile Destroyer "Knight"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Lancer-Class Guided Missile Cruiser "Bishop"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Aegis-Class ASW/AAW Cruiser "Rook"

"We are the Aces of Aces, We fly high and fight to survive"
~Furturewarfare
TimothyC
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact:

Re: NAF Triden-Class Battleship

#9 Post by TimothyC »

You got them from the Post WW2 parts sheet (they are the Mk 45 Mod 4s). You'll want something like the Mk 12 5"/38 twin, or the Mk 16 5"/54 single, or, when I find it, the twin version of the Mk 16 (It's someplace on my hard drive).
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: NAF Triden-Class Battleship

#10 Post by erik_t »

You have far too much topweight. Super-duper-firing 18" triples demands a pretty comical hull, something like a Malaccamax container ship.
Post Reply