British carriers 50-85.

Post drawings of ships that actually exist or have existed at some point.

Moderator: Community Manager

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Bombhead
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#281 Post by Bombhead »

Thanks for that info Sumer.Magnificent with Fireflys or Avengers.Thanks Hood for the top quality aircraft.

Image

Image
Top
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#282 Post by heuhen »

nice
Top
Rodondo
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#283 Post by Rodondo »

Very pretty Bombhead!
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)
There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards
Top
User avatar
Portsmouth Bill
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#284 Post by Portsmouth Bill »

Another Gem, congratulations on fine drawings :)
Top
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#285 Post by acelanceloet »

I must ask.... which firefly's have we covered now? the dutch parts sheet still lacks the T1, T2, mk IV & Mk V..... all these carriers with firefly's on board makes me wonder if we have (some of) those covered now?
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Top
User avatar
Bombhead
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#286 Post by Bombhead »

Thanks for the encourageing comments mates.Ace I will have to get back to you on that.The one thing I did notice was the top view with folded wings is wrong though,as they should fold backwards instead of up.Whoops, My mistake not Hood's.
Top
Hood
Posts: 7234
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#287 Post by Hood »

We've got the Fairet Firefly I and the AS.6 in the new version. That should be fine for all the chin radiator and un-chinned variants. The pods are easily removable if you don't want an AS.6. There isn't really much point drawing all the various marks at this scale as they all look the same!
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
Top
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#288 Post by acelanceloet »

Hood wrote:We've got the Fairet Firefly I and the AS.6 in the new version. That should be fine for all the chin radiator and un-chinned variants. The pods are easily removable if you don't want an AS.6. There isn't really much point drawing all the various marks at this scale as they all look the same!
I will start looking for refs and colour schemes for the dutch ones then..... :P thanks!
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Top
Hood
Posts: 7234
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#289 Post by Hood »

Image
This should help you Ace, note that BH has made some adjustments to the arrestor hook on his carrier pic above.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
Top
Wolfman
Posts: 254
Joined: July 26th, 2011, 6:48 pm

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#290 Post by Wolfman »

Nice work, Hood.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Real Designs”