WikiStates Gems

Post drawings from any Alternate Universe scenario here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: WikiStates Gems

#31 Post by klagldsf »

Hood wrote:
The Hardenburgh looks identical to the original to me (I drew the original, Tornado being my What-If modellers alter-ego). Still at least it looks pretty cool compared to the rest on that page.
You're going to have to elaborate on what you were aiming for, please.
Hood
Posts: 7234
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: WikiStates Gems

#32 Post by Hood »

klagldsf, not sure what you mean.

Aiming for what? I just said its identical to the original drawing, ie. he did nothing other than maybe change the flag. I drew the thing so I should know what it looks like. I cant find any changes even with the admittedly small scale of the picture. A good artist should know every pixel of his own drawing if he hasn't just cut 'n' pasted and blagged the whole thing.
Personally I find adding credits just because you changed a flag pretty annoying, correct but annoying. He could have changed soemthing or at least tried to improve on it or alter it in some way. A credit on the picture should reflect some kind of effort on the part of the second artist.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
Gollevainen
Posts: 4712
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: WikiStates Gems

#33 Post by Gollevainen »

A good artist should know every pixel of his own drawing if he hasn't just cut 'n' pasted and blagged the whole thing.
Personally I find adding credits just because you changed a flag pretty annoying, correct but annoying. He could have changed soemthing or at least tried to improve on it or alter it in some way. A credit on the picture should reflect some kind of effort on the part of the second artist.
klagldsf, not sure what you mean.

Aiming for what? I just said its identical to the original drawing, ie. he did nothing other than maybe change the flag. I drew the thing so I should know what it looks like. I cant find any changes even with the admittedly small scale of the picture. A good artist should know every pixel of his own drawing if he hasn't just cut 'n' pasted and blagged the whole thing.
Personally I find adding credits just because you changed a flag pretty annoying, correct but annoying. He could have changed soemthing or at least tried to improve on it or alter it in some way. A credit on the picture should reflect some kind of effort on the part of the second artist.
This

Nothing can be more annoying when you have spend months and months around some ship with your arm paralyzed from too much of mouse movement and pixels popping in and out from your brain... and then some upstart geezer goes to change the flag and adds some superficial poor copypaste things atop of the drawing and claims the rigth place his name under the credits...
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: WikiStates Gems

#34 Post by klagldsf »

Hood wrote:klagldsf, not sure what you mean.

Aiming for what?
I mean what was the intention of the original drawing - it's in the Never Built section so I'm assuming its based off of real blueprints?
Tarsas
Posts: 6
Joined: October 20th, 2010, 8:47 pm

Re: WikiStates Gems

#35 Post by Tarsas »

Don't I at least get an A for fucking effort? :/

I can't draw that well. Draw me a better one if you don't like it.

The Victory class was my best attempt and it doesn't measure up to any of you good artists, but I at least tried instead of steal someone else's and write my name on it.
Last edited by Tarsas on October 20th, 2010, 11:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: WikiStates Gems

#36 Post by Colosseum »

No, because from what I can tell, you took someone else's crap and moved it around a bit. That's not an A for effort.
Tarsas
Posts: 6
Joined: October 20th, 2010, 8:47 pm

Re: WikiStates Gems

#37 Post by Tarsas »

Still sucks, but I did fix the problem with the Mk 41 and the Mk 13 mounting platform as was suggested. I'm not a shipbucket artist but I don't want to be a total failure.
TimothyC
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact:

Re: WikiStates Gems

#38 Post by TimothyC »

Tarsas wrote:but I at least tried instead of steal someone else's and write my name on it.
No, you just attached my name to a stinking pile of fertilizer.
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Finfan
Posts: 64
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 11:32 pm

Re: WikiStates Gems

#39 Post by Finfan »

Tarsas wrote: Draw me a better one if you don't like it.
This is not an argument.
Tarsas
Posts: 6
Joined: October 20th, 2010, 8:47 pm

Re: WikiStates Gems

#40 Post by Tarsas »

TimothyC wrote:
Tarsas wrote:but I at least tried instead of steal someone else's and write my name on it.
No, you just attached my name to a stinking pile of fertilizer.
Was just trying to credit correctly.
Post Reply