Submarines

Post drawings of ships that actually exist or have existed at some point.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
SHIPDUDE
Posts: 145
Joined: February 17th, 2012, 5:42 am

Re: Submarines

#241 Post by SHIPDUDE »

Submarines change color between dock visits!

The US Navy is also switching to blue!
Wolfman
Posts: 254
Joined: July 26th, 2011, 6:48 pm

Re: Submarines

#242 Post by Wolfman »

SHIPDUDE wrote:Submarines change color between dock visits!

The US Navy is also switching to blue!
What?!?! Where the Hell did you hear or read that?
User avatar
SHIPDUDE
Posts: 145
Joined: February 17th, 2012, 5:42 am

Re: Submarines

#243 Post by SHIPDUDE »

This is 2009 news! :cry:
Wolfman
Posts: 254
Joined: July 26th, 2011, 6:48 pm

Re: Submarines

#244 Post by Wolfman »

I think you're crazy.
User avatar
SHIPDUDE
Posts: 145
Joined: February 17th, 2012, 5:42 am

Re: Submarines

#245 Post by SHIPDUDE »

Image
Wolfman
Posts: 254
Joined: July 26th, 2011, 6:48 pm

Re: Submarines

#246 Post by Wolfman »

If you ask me, the Navy's ships looked better with red below the waterline.
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Submarines

#247 Post by Thiel »

How's that applicable to submarines?
Specifically nuclear submarines whose operating pattern makes anti fouling paint superfluous?
(Their tendency to move constantly makes it very hard for marine growths to get a grip on them.)
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
User avatar
SHIPDUDE
Posts: 145
Joined: February 17th, 2012, 5:42 am

Re: Submarines

#248 Post by SHIPDUDE »

Well...many US submarines receive antifouling in the yards - I suspect for aesthetic reasons during launching ceremonies!

This turns to an unsightly green during patrols and wears away.

New silicon based fouling release paints work on different principles - the poor marine creatures can't get a grip! :cry:

So constant motion is actually an advantage for this type of paint. Of course last I heard it only being applied to Arleigh Burkes and Ticonderogas, but marine fouling is a larger problem for submarines than commonly suspected!

Image

Good for sonar?

But this is straying off topic.

Short answer - some US submarines will have antifouling paint, some will not. It will depend on the individual boat and time period!
Wolfman
Posts: 254
Joined: July 26th, 2011, 6:48 pm

Re: Submarines

#249 Post by Wolfman »

Good God, that is one disgusting image!
User avatar
SHIPDUDE
Posts: 145
Joined: February 17th, 2012, 5:42 am

Re: Submarines

#250 Post by SHIPDUDE »

Yes - submarines can be gross.

(Although I haven't heard much about the "artificial mucus" idea from the 80s lately! :o )
Post Reply