USN Systems (02/26/2013)

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: USN Systems

#251 Post by erik_t »

Regarding 3/70:

Per the above-linked navweaps figure, the turret should be 151.38" high from deck to top of sighting bubble, or 25.2px. My version is 26px high; heuhen's adjusted version is 22px. The overall length of the gunhouse should be 200" or 33.3px. My version is 35px; heuhen's is 30px. Overall length (muzzle to back of gunhouse) should be about 313" or 52px. My version is 54px; heuhen's is 46px. Clearance circle should be 248" or 41.3px; my version is 41px; heuhen's is 38px.

In every case, my version is as accurate or more accurate than the revised version. While mine could use some fine-tuning in size, everyone please make sure that any new version is more accurate than the old one. Less accurate does nobody any good.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9105
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: USN Systems

#252 Post by heuhen »

erik_t wrote:Regarding 3/70:

Per the above-linked navweaps figure, the turret should be 151.38" high from deck to top of sighting bubble, or 25.2px. My version is 26px high; heuhen's adjusted version is 22px. The overall length of the gunhouse should be 200" or 33.3px. My version is 35px; heuhen's is 30px. Overall length (muzzle to back of gunhouse) should be about 313" or 52px. My version is 54px; heuhen's is 46px. Clearance circle should be 248" or 41.3px; my version is 41px; heuhen's is 38px.

In every case, my version is as accurate or more accurate than the revised version. While mine could use some fine-tuning in size, everyone please make sure that any new version is more accurate than the old one. Less accurate does nobody any good.
We have the Scandinavian inches, we have the U.S., and we have the international. Guess what I used. It's also why my was completely wrong ...
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: USN Systems

#253 Post by erik_t »

Well, you learn something new every day. I wasn't aware there was a Scandanavian inch in regular (or even irregular) use. Would this be the 25mm 'metric inch'?

And would you like to resize it again, with the 25.4mm inch this time? :)
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9105
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: USN Systems

#254 Post by heuhen »

erik_t wrote:Well, you learn something new every day. I wasn't aware there was a Scandanavian inch in regular (or even irregular) use. Would this be the 25mm 'metric inch'?

And would you like to resize it again, with the 25.4mm inch this time? :)

We have the Norwegian one and we have the old danish one.

And I will do!
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: USN Systems

#255 Post by Thiel »

erik_t wrote:Well, you learn something new every day. I wasn't aware there was a Scandanavian inch in regular (or even irregular) use. Would this be the 25mm 'metric inch'?
The Danish inch is ~26.16mm.
It's almost never used any more though it does pop up from time to time within shipbuilding, carpentry and plumbing.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9105
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: USN Systems

#256 Post by heuhen »

Thiel wrote:
erik_t wrote:Well, you learn something new every day. I wasn't aware there was a Scandanavian inch in regular (or even irregular) use. Would this be the 25mm 'metric inch'?
The Danish inch is ~26.16mm.
It's almost never used any more though it does pop up from time to time within shipbuilding, carpentry and plumbing.
When I build old Norwegian viking boats, we had that problem many time!
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9105
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: USN Systems

#257 Post by heuhen »

What about this:
Image


"Oh. so this topic is clean someone can delete those post i have made with the wrong size. so also no one use them to!"
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: USN Systems

#258 Post by erik_t »

All previous versions had the GUNAR misplaced in the side view, and did not have the viewports below the 'frog eye' domes. Heuhen, your top view is the right size but needs the aforementioned viewports.

Image
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9105
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: USN Systems

#259 Post by heuhen »

erik_t wrote:All previous versions had the GUNAR misplaced in the side view, and did not have the viewports below the 'frog eye' domes. Heuhen, your top view is the right size but needs the aforementioned viewports.

[img]http://i387.photobucket.com/albums/oo31 ... _erikt.png[/img
Thats look god. I'm Lost in translation so you can do that edit if it is needed. or you have to feed me with a spoon! hehe
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: USN Systems

#260 Post by Thiel »

He's referring to the gap were the GUNAR radar sticks out of.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Post Reply