Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Post drawings from any Alternate Universe scenario here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
Carthaginian
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#581 Post by Carthaginian »

A very nice looking ship- one that could perform 'station ship' and 'colonial cruiser' duties after Final Victory.
A very flexible vessel.
Rodondo
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#582 Post by Rodondo »

It does look like a huge colonial sloop doesn't it?
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards
Carthaginian
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#583 Post by Carthaginian »

Looks like one, has the necessary equipment, provides the necessary facilities... would work perfectly.
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

Oceanic Research Vessel 'Sternenschweif' 1952

#584 Post by Ashley »

Yes, the Mutzenbachers were very versitle ships. The 'Peter Beutler' was refitted as oceanic research vessel in 1952 and came as 'Sternenschweif' to the oceanographic institute. Most of the armament and directing equipment was removed and small labs installed. The aft deck no carries a flight deck with two Weserflug-VTOLs. Just a 5,5cm-twin and a 5" twin DP are still on the fore deck. Finally the 'Sternenschweif is just a loan by Kriegsmarine to the institute until they get their very own vessels.
Image
The painting is not the usual 1946 invasion camo, it is nearly as real german research vessels are painted.
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

One for Sudwestafrika

#585 Post by Ashley »

The 'Rainer Merkant' was given to the new formed independent state Südwestafrika as gift. The catapult was removed and a triple 'Geier'-launcher installed. Ammo was stored behind the funnel. When given away the now named 'Grootfontein' was still in blueish camo.
Image
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#586 Post by erik_t »

As far as research ships go, it's hard to imagine a period warship being much use without a new-construction deckhouse for labs, equipment, etc.
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#587 Post by klagldsf »

...or any conceivable reason why it would have armaments.
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#588 Post by Ashley »

erik_t wrote:As far as research ships go, it's hard to imagine a period warship being much use without a new-construction deckhouse for labs, equipment, etc.
There is much space from former ammo stores und below the flight deck.
klagldsf wrote:...or any conceivable reason why it would have armaments.
The ship was given to the institute under the rule it could go back into active service any time. So the fore arms were kept. And who knows what heavy armed monsters are lurking at the unknown areas of the world? Better safe than sorry.
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#589 Post by Thiel »

In this case it'll be sorry, since she won't be able to seek port anywhere since, like you said, she's operated by civilians yet she carries weapons. Surprisingly, most governments tends to take a dim view on that sort of thing.
Also, why retain the floatplane if you're going to have VTOL aircraft? (Unless of course the civilian engineers realize just how mechanically unsound the Weserflug design was)
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Carthaginian
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

#590 Post by Carthaginian »

Some 'civilian' Sealift Command vessels are armed; the Mars class combat stores ships had as many as six 3" guns mounted at one time or another.
And if one really desires to get technical- ALL U.S. Coast Guard ships were owned by the Department of the Treasury or the Department of Transportation until 2002. This means that they were not military vessels at all, but armed civilian law enforcement vessels- occasionally rather heavily armed ones at that!

I see little real difference here- if the vessel's operational crew was taken for the Reich's 'Coast Guard Equivalent,' then it could probably get away with being armed while still being 'civilian' in nature.
Post Reply