Grays Harbor Designs

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#111 Post by Zephyr »

ALVAMA wrote:
Zephyr wrote:This is the lynx I used, from the parts sheet
Image

I see what you mean about the bridge now. Suggestions on where to add the break?

wow!!! They still exist! the 2008 drawing! :lol:
We're an old fashioned navy
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#112 Post by Zephyr »

ok, ok. raised the aft section of the bridge.

Image

and not that it matters, the results would be the same albeit reversed, but you got my funnel arrangement wrong. The aft funnel is to starboard and the forward funnel is to port.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#113 Post by acelanceloet »

I know , but it was just an quick scratch. and you shall have to lower the funnels a bit too, as right now you still have an (smaller, but still) blind spot just above the horizon, the area anti-ship missiles really like to use.... you could of course discard that and leave it to the SPS-49 and the goalkeeper, but it would not be what I would prefer
on a sidenote, to be honest, seems I was right on the uglyness of this solution.
and please change that damned lynx -.- just to make certain that you understand what I mean: the drawing of it, not the helicopter it is representing.;)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#114 Post by Thiel »

I have to say the rounded funnels looks odd on a ship that is all angles.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#115 Post by erik_t »

SPS-49 has to be able to rotate.
User avatar
Demon Lord Razgriz
Posts: 446
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:18 am
Location: Eastern North Carolina

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#116 Post by Demon Lord Razgriz »

I must ask, what is the reason that you have mid-ship VLS? Cause it seems this is the main source of problems for this design.
95% of my drawings are destined for NS, 4.9% for fun, & .1% serious.
Worklist:
Space Shuttle
Atlas V
Delta II/III
Project Constellation
Soyuz series
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#117 Post by Zephyr »

Demon Lord Razgriz wrote:I must ask, what is the reason that you have mid-ship VLS? Cause it seems this is the main source of problems for this design.
Simple answer, and not meant in a "smart-assy" way....

Because thats where I wanted them. *shrug* I like the way it looks and I'm able to fit more than a handful here and there. As narrow as the bow section is, no meaningful VLS battery could be fitted there, and I did not want to try and crowd them in aft of the helipad. I want something unique, not yet another Tico-clone.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#118 Post by Zephyr »

Image

I don't want to lower the funnels further, and definately don't want to raise the superstructure any more than it is, so I guess we will have to accept a small compromise with that minor blind spot and trust to the GK to catch anything in that area. That and the fact that these ships will rarely, if ever, operate solo, but will always be part of at least a Task group and will have numerous dedicated AAW destroyers and frigates in the screening elements.

Changed the Lynx. The only one I could find was on the Dutch parts sheet you linked to. I changed the colors from the Dutch to GHRN gray, and will most likely be changing to that version on all my ships that carry the Lynx.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#119 Post by erik_t »

You still can't actually use your air search set.
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#120 Post by Zephyr »

And why is that? It has room to fully rotate.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Post Reply