No words, man... absolutely no words.
Just string "Yeah," "Uh," "Wow," and "Damn" together in any generally incoherent manner and that'll just about cover it.
I too would hate to see both of these ships sank. My suggestion is that one of them- I've never liked the name Superb[/b], so I'll pick her- is valiantly destroyed leading a Thermopylae-style defense of the British Isles, while the Conqueror and a very small task force undertakes the most vital mission the Royal Navy has ever had- the evacuation of the Royal Family to Canada.
Safely ensconced beneath the massive 10" thick armored deck and behind walls of 20" of steel, George VI and his family are evacuated from their final Royal Residence in the British Isles- a rented upstairs room in a pub in Donegal. They are taken across the Atlantic in a top secret operation involving the massive Conqueror and a small flotilla of destroyers, light cruisers, and two Vindictive class light carriers. In spite of the fact that she is hit by seven torpedoes, she manages to arrive in St. Johns a few days later. The vessel was hastily repaired and remained a continuously moving palace for the Royal Family, cruising the Gulf of St. Lawrence until the signing of the Peace.
EDIT: Stated Tonnage WILL NOT support this vessel. You're looking at AT LEAST 175,000 tons standard with the possibility of the vessel breaking 182,000 fully loaded! Additionally, the cost will be at least 77.35 million Pounds! That's just from a 'guesstimate' SS that doesn't have anything smaller than the 14" twins mounted!!!
Incredible I hate to detract from this stupendous effort, and I appreciate it could never be built in 'real life', but the one feature that just doesnt grok is the choice of mixed calibre major guns. All navies renounced this after the Dreadnought, one good reason being the difficulty in range finding the diferent calibres. Still, who cares?
A Fi 167 torpedoes the rudder on the superb, it gets cut down by smaller BBs
ALVAMA wrote:I feel sorry for you, I agree you must have such terrible life, and no girl give you attention, The boys leaved because they were not having a safe feeling when beeing with you. Police never found you. Docters did suidice, because they where impressed you was not killed by birth
I SS'd Superb last night. Note: The drawing shows a non-RN 3-screw layout. I had to go with 4 screws to have any chance of making speed and I had to guess at a lot of information. If Superb is redrawn please do a 4-screw layout...
******************
Superb, RN Super Battleship laid down 1939
Displacement:
128,057 t light; 133,377 t standard; 137,248 t normal; 140,345 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
1,195.35 ft / 1,180.00 ft x 120.00 ft (Bulges 140.00 ft) x 31.00 ft (normal load)
364.34 m / 359.66 m x 36.58 m (Bulges 42.67 m) x 9.45 m
Armament:
8 - 20.00" / 508 mm guns (4x2 guns), 4,000.00lbs / 1,814.37kg shells, 1939 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
16 - 14.00" / 356 mm guns (8x2 guns), 1,372.00lbs / 622.33kg shells, 1939 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on side, all amidships, 4 raised mounts - superfiring
24 - 5.25" / 133 mm guns (12x2 guns), 72.35lbs / 32.82kg shells, 1939 Model
Dual purpose guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
104 - 1.57" / 40.0 mm guns (13x8 guns), 1.95lbs / 0.88kg shells, 1939 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, 8 raised mounts
72 - 0.50" / 12.7 mm guns (18x4 guns), 0.06lbs / 0.03kg shells, 1939 Model
Machine guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
Weight of broadside 55,896 lbs / 25,354 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 80
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 21.0" / 533 mm 550.00 ft / 167.64 m 15.00 ft / 4.57 m
Ends: 8.00" / 203 mm 200.00 ft / 60.96 m 15.00 ft / 4.57 m
430.00 ft / 131.06 m Unarmoured ends
Upper: 12.0" / 305 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 10.00 ft / 3.05 m
Main Belt covers 72 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead and Bulges:
3.00" / 76 mm 800.00 ft / 243.84 m 25.00 ft / 7.62 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 18.0" / 457 mm 12.0" / 305 mm 16.0" / 406 mm
2nd: 14.0" / 356 mm 10.0" / 254 mm 12.0" / 305 mm
3rd: 2.00" / 51 mm 1.50" / 38 mm 2.00" / 51 mm
4th: 1.00" / 25 mm - -
- Armour deck: 8.00" / 203 mm, Conning tower: 16.00" / 406 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 282,692 shp / 210,888 Kw = 29.00 kts
Range 6,000nm at 14.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 6,968 tons
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
269,420 lbs / 122,207 Kg = 67.4 x 20.0 " / 508 mm shells or 46.8 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.14
Metacentric height 8.4 ft / 2.6 m
Roll period: 20.3 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 53 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.98
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.40
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
Block coefficient: 0.938
Length to Beam Ratio: 8.43 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 34.35 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 43 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 38
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 18.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 3.00 ft / 0.91 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
- Mid (50 %): 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
- Stern: 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
- Average freeboard: 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 68.2 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 280.6 %
Waterplane Area: 138,147 Square feet or 12,834 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 111 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 307 lbs/sq ft or 1,498 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 1.13
- Longitudinal: 0.97
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
************
She looks really good, except for one facet; the Block Coefficient. Gentlemen, we have a brick. Actually we have a cube. Except for that one number it works. Too much is being asked here, using 1945 or later engines would help (thought probably not enough); I'll give that a shot.
Keeping the same hull dimensions and armament I lowered the BC...
****************
Superb, RN Super Battleship laid down 1939
Displacement:
102,153 t light; 106,899 t standard; 108,569 t normal; 109,906 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
1,195.35 ft / 1,180.00 ft x 120.00 ft (Bulges 140.00 ft) x 31.00 ft (normal load)
364.34 m / 359.66 m x 36.58 m (Bulges 42.67 m) x 9.45 m
Armament:
8 - 20.00" / 508 mm guns (4x2 guns), 4,000.00lbs / 1,814.37kg shells, 1939 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
16 - 14.00" / 356 mm guns (8x2 guns), 1,372.00lbs / 622.33kg shells, 1939 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on side, all amidships, 4 raised mounts - superfiring
24 - 5.25" / 133 mm guns (12x2 guns), 72.35lbs / 32.82kg shells, 1939 Model
Dual purpose guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
104 - 1.57" / 40.0 mm guns (13x8 guns), 1.95lbs / 0.88kg shells, 1939 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, 8 raised mounts
72 - 0.50" / 12.7 mm guns (18x4 guns), 0.06lbs / 0.03kg shells, 1939 Model
Machine guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
Weight of broadside 55,896 lbs / 25,354 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 80
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 16.0" / 406 mm 550.00 ft / 167.64 m 15.00 ft / 4.57 m
Ends: 6.00" / 152 mm 200.00 ft / 60.96 m 15.00 ft / 4.57 m
430.00 ft / 131.06 m Unarmoured ends
Upper: 8.00" / 203 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 10.00 ft / 3.05 m
Main Belt covers 72 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead and Bulges:
3.00" / 76 mm 800.00 ft / 243.84 m 25.00 ft / 7.62 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 16.0" / 406 mm 10.0" / 254 mm 14.0" / 356 mm
2nd: 12.0" / 305 mm 9.00" / 229 mm 10.0" / 254 mm
3rd: 2.00" / 51 mm 1.50" / 38 mm 2.00" / 51 mm
4th: 1.00" / 25 mm - -
- Armour deck: 6.00" / 152 mm, Conning tower: 15.00" / 381 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 134,326 shp / 100,207 Kw = 25.00 kts
Range 5,000nm at 10.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 3,008 tons
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
212,551 lbs / 96,411 Kg = 53.1 x 20.0 " / 508 mm shells or 37.0 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.15
Metacentric height 8.5 ft / 2.6 m
Roll period: 20.1 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 41 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.97
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.13
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
Block coefficient: 0.742
Length to Beam Ratio: 8.43 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 34.35 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 32 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 30
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 18.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 3.00 ft / 0.91 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
- Mid (50 %): 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
- Stern: 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
- Average freeboard: 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 71.4 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 285.2 %
Waterplane Area: 117,773 Square feet or 10,941 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 106 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 296 lbs/sq ft or 1,447 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 1.01
- Longitudinal: 0.99
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
*************
Armor was thinned everywhere. Speed dropped and I am not happy with a cruising speed of 10 knots. But BC dropped to ~0.75 which I can live with.
One suggestion, drop the 4 superfiring 14-inch turrets. Doing that, thinning the belt to a more reasonable 16-18 inches and dropping speed to 26-27 knots (possibly with 1943 or later engines plus 4 screws) and I think we can get this design to work...
Superb is certainly interesting. I've been playing around with a late-40s USN BB of the maximum size supportable by the period plans for a third set of Panama locks, also of 4x3 20". I derived a few scaling laws from USN triples of 12-16" and through the Japanese 18" (via a Nagato/Colorado adjustment factor); I came to the conclusion that the barbette diameter of such a 20"x3, with USN design practices, would come out to 119 pixels at Shipbucket scale (give or take). Assuming such a thing could be built at all, a prospect I find at least slightly dubious.
I do have a few nitpicks - the after main/secondary directors cannot see over the after main battery turrets, and the 5.25" battery seems quite weak compared to the 14" battery. I'd gladly trade half of the 14" turrets for a massively superior heavy-caliber DP battery.
Portsmouth Bill wrote:Incredible I hate to detract from this stupendous effort, and I appreciate it could never be built in 'real life', but the one feature that just doesnt grok is the choice of mixed calibre major guns. All navies renounced this after the Dreadnought, one good reason being the difficulty in range finding the diferent calibres. Still, who cares?
On a ship that would massively outweigh most competitors, I think a reasonable argument can be made for it. I would expect the 20" battery to train and fire extremely slowly (1rpm seems optimistic), and gun tube life would be pretty lousy. It'd be very attractive to engage eg. torpedo-carrying heavy cruisers with the 14" battery rather than waste precious 20" ammunition and tube life.
I would go with a showdown off of the US or Canadian coast. As your timeline implies, the Kriegsmarine would be looking to pick battles father away from European shores, leaving the British fleet left to defend.
Portsmouth Bill wrote:Incredible I hate to detract from this stupendous effort, and I appreciate it could never be built in 'real life', but the one feature that just doesnt grok is the choice of mixed calibre major guns. All navies renounced this after the Dreadnought, one good reason being the difficulty in range finding the diferent calibres. Still, who cares?
Sorry, the 14"s are secondairies... first I think the rate of fire of the 20" would be 1-1.3 rpm, the 14"s get over 2 rpm. You wont blast a cruiser with 20" shells if a 14" will do the job as good. Economics... With 20" you blow holes in Yamatos. In my opinion the 14" was an adequate secondairy gun. Sure, best would have been a large calibre DP. But DPs end at around 5".
BTW. she has 4 screws, maybe it was not shown clearly enough.
Thanks for the springsharps, guys. I'm glad, the proposed data fits nearly.
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
eltf177 wrote:Armor was thinned everywhere. Speed dropped and I am not happy with a cruising speed of 10 knots. But BC dropped to ~0.75 which I can live with.
One suggestion, drop the 4 superfiring 14-inch turrets. Doing that, thinning the belt to a more reasonable 16-18 inches and dropping speed to 26-27 knots (possibly with 1943 or later engines plus 4 screws) and I think we can get this design to work...
Uhm... 0.75 is intolerable. It's more like a river barge than a ship.
IIRC, about the highest battleship BC I could find in the USN was 0.67, and that was a Standard that had been bulged until it was almost as wide as it was long. Nope, if the BC isn't AT MOST 0.65, I wouldn't consider it a legitimate design... not even for a pre-dread.
Yeah, 0.6 was a lot more typical for a WW2 battleship.
Rethinking the secondary armament arguments, I think a strong case could be made for a wholesale shift to 6"/50 QF Mk V and the British 3"/70. Money is obviously no object...
No words, man... absolutely no words. 
I hate to detract from this stupendous effort, and I appreciate it could never be built in 'real life', but the one feature that just doesnt grok is the choice of mixed calibre major guns. All navies renounced this after the Dreadnought, one good reason being the difficulty in range finding the diferent calibres. Still, who cares? 
