CGBL
Moderator: Community Manager
-
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
- Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
- Contact:
Re: CGBL
Hm, Tim, considering the location and the fact that they appear angled to the front/back in the lineart, I think that's not a smaller set of intakes on the forward superstructure above the regular ones, but rather a location for chaff launchers.
Would you please not eat my gun...
Re: CGBL
Quite possibly.MihoshiK wrote:Hm, Tim, considering the location and the fact that they appear angled to the front/back in the lineart, I think that's not a smaller set of intakes on the forward superstructure above the regular ones, but rather a location for chaff launchers.
One issue I am having is that the uptakes are just not big enough. I may add a second row below the current ones.
πππππππ- π»π πͺπππππππ πππ
ππ πΊππππ
Re: CGBL
Overall its looking good. A very purposeful design that somehoe reminds me of those unbuilt early 1960s Soviet cruisers in overall appearance.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
Re: CGBL
πππππππ- π»π πͺπππππππ πππ
ππ πΊππππ
Re: CGBL
Nice work. I found out about the CGBL a few years ago and I've been fascinated with it ever since. One peculiar thing, though, not with your work, but the design itself. Why only three missile directors instead of four like the Ticos? It seems odd that the Navy would hamper a CG's capabilities in that way.
Re: CGBL
I'm presuming that the forward directors are side-by-side, just as they are on the Ticos themselves. It really does contrary to the idea of building built to Burke standards (something that Erik just said to me, and I happen to agree with it). I am looking at tracking down where the painting is so that a higher resolution image might someday make it online. Until then I'm stuck with what I've posted here (and on a couple of other forums).ghost792 wrote:Nice work. I found out about the CGBL a few years ago and I've been fascinated with it ever since. One peculiar thing, though, not with your work, but the design itself. Why only three missile directors instead of four like the Ticos? It seems odd that the Navy would hamper a CG's capabilities in that way.
πππππππ- π»π πͺπππππππ πππ
ππ πΊππππ
Re: CGBL
Best guess I have is that they cross fire across the bow.
πππππππ- π»π πͺπππππππ πππ
ππ πΊππππ
Re: CGBL
looks great, apart from the aft funnel being the tallest, just my humble opinion.
Morten812
Morten Jensen
Randers
Denmark
Traffic Manager
Morten Jensen
Randers
Denmark
Traffic Manager