British carriers 50-85.
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: British carriers 50-85.
That would be interesting,cheers mate.Just waiting for one of Kim's superb badges.Many thanks go to whoever drew the deck planking.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Superb drawing, truely a master piece we came to expect from you.
Thank you Kim for the crest
"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
-
- Posts: 7514
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: British carriers 50-85.
that.... is one interesting ship. I guess she was build with an full deck originally? (and if yes, can we expect the original version? )
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Re: British carriers 50-85.
The original version would be easy enough to do,it's the perenial problem of the top view aircraft.Thanks for that Novice I' pleased you liked her
Re: British carriers 50-85.
A beautiful drawing.
I hesitate to criticise but I have noticed a tendency in some of drawings which include a plan (top) view and single Bofors the artists flip the mounting part drawing from starboard to port. That isn't correct; A Bofors is asymmetric and flipping it is incorrect. You would have to rotate the drawing to get the correct configuration. In this case I believe the aft port mount is incorrect. You can see Bombhead working on the problem in his beautiful HMS Triumph drawing.
Other than that - very nice.
I hesitate to criticise but I have noticed a tendency in some of drawings which include a plan (top) view and single Bofors the artists flip the mounting part drawing from starboard to port. That isn't correct; A Bofors is asymmetric and flipping it is incorrect. You would have to rotate the drawing to get the correct configuration. In this case I believe the aft port mount is incorrect. You can see Bombhead working on the problem in his beautiful HMS Triumph drawing.
Other than that - very nice.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
You are 100% correct Wizard the 40mm single is not symetical.Thanks for pointing that out that mistake.Still it gives me a good excuse to re-post with the fix and of course Kims excellent badge.What a cracker.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Beautiful
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Good stuff. Another fine carrier drawing to get someway towards acrhiving all the RN carriers.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
- schepper911
- Posts: 146
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 3:01 pm
Re: British carriers 50-85.
marvelous drawing, i love how you made the planes landing and taking off an masterpiece