British carriers 50-85.

Post drawings of ships that actually exist or have existed at some point.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Bombhead
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#91 Post by Bombhead »

That would be interesting,cheers mate.Just waiting for one of Kim's superb badges.Many thanks go to whoever drew the deck planking.

Image
Novice
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#92 Post by Novice »

Superb drawing, truely a master piece we came to expect from you.
Image Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#93 Post by acelanceloet »

that.... is one interesting ship. I guess she was build with an full deck originally? (and if yes, can we expect the original version? :P)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Bombhead
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#94 Post by Bombhead »

The original version would be easy enough to do,it's the perenial problem of the top view aircraft.Thanks for that Novice I' pleased you liked her ;)
Wizard
Posts: 34
Joined: September 21st, 2010, 9:52 am

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#95 Post by Wizard »

A beautiful drawing.

I hesitate to criticise but I have noticed a tendency in some of drawings which include a plan (top) view and single Bofors the artists flip the mounting part drawing from starboard to port. That isn't correct; A Bofors is asymmetric and flipping it is incorrect. You would have to rotate the drawing to get the correct configuration. In this case I believe the aft port mount is incorrect. You can see Bombhead working on the problem in his beautiful HMS Triumph drawing.

Other than that - very nice.
User avatar
Bombhead
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#96 Post by Bombhead »

You are 100% correct Wizard the 40mm single is not symetical.Thanks for pointing that out that mistake.Still it gives me a good excuse to re-post with the fix and of course Kims excellent badge.What a cracker.

Image

Image
User avatar
KimWerner
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#97 Post by KimWerner »

Beautiful :D
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms
Hood
Posts: 7239
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#98 Post by Hood »

Good stuff. Another fine carrier drawing to get someway towards acrhiving all the RN carriers.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
User avatar
Bombhead
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#99 Post by Bombhead »

Image
User avatar
schepper911
Posts: 146
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 3:01 pm

Re: British carriers 50-85.

#100 Post by schepper911 »

marvelous drawing, i love how you made the planes landing and taking off an masterpiece
Post Reply