Boeing 797-100

[Pegasus]

Ok, good for you. That doesn't necessarily mean that the 747's cross-section is the same as my design. Just because I started with a 747 image and modified it doesn't mean the other dimensions are the same as the 747's. It's my design.

[klagldsf]

...do you have any idea what kind of engineering changes would go into changing the cross-section of an airplane like that?

Have you ever seen a 747 from other than a profile angle?

[Pegasus]

Dude, I don't think you get the point of this being my own design. Just because I started with a 747 image doesn't mean that (if this were to be an actual design) they'd take a 747 and modify it. This is something that would be built from the ground up. It's my design so I can say what its cross-section is, and I say it has a 3-4-3 aisle layout with the size to fit it.

[klagldsf]

Dude, I don't think you get the point of this being my own design. Just because I started with a 747 image doesn't mean that (if this were to be an actual design) they'd take a 747 and modify it.

...it kinda does, otherwise it'd quit looking like a 747.

It's my design so I can say what its cross-section is, and I say it has a 3-4-3 aisle layout with the size to fit it.

The 747 already had a 3-4-3 aisle layout on its main deck, to have an identical layout on the top deck is very difficult to pull off, not even the A380 attempts this.

[Pegasus]

...it kinda does, otherwise it'd quit looking like a 747.

That's kind of the point. IT'S NOT A 747!

[klagldsf]

...so why does it look like one?

[Pegasus]

Um, because that's the image I started with? What I started with is entirely irrelevant. It's just a picture.