Planebucket Discussion Thread
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Mil Mi-28 "Havoc" anyone make it already ?
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
yes.Rhade wrote:Mil Mi-28 "Havoc" anyone make it already ?
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Ahhh ... double posting, shame on me.
We have amazing planes here, so maybe it's good time to update main archive with them ?
We have amazing planes here, so maybe it's good time to update main archive with them ?
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
You're welcome to compile the sheets.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
-
- Posts: 7516
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
better idea, to help tim with the sbaap
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Has any one drawn the Yak-141?
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Yes
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Where? I cannot find it.