Pr. 11356 Update
Moderator: Community Manager
-
Gollevainen
- Posts: 4715
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Pr. 11356 Update
Well nothing fancy this time. I just took the MConrads old Talwar into table, added some shade, removed some lines that didn't exist and repaired the Bridge which was quite wrongly presented. I also replaced the ordanance with the newer variants and added my drawn underwater hull. As the whole class seems to be in intersting reneisance, I also included the Teg class follow on's as well as the Russians very own Admiral Essin class that was just laid down.
Re: Pr. 11356 Update
I sort of assumed any future use of SA-N-7/12 would be via VLS. The Russians are still building new arm launchers?
-
Gollevainen
- Posts: 4715
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: Pr. 11356 Update
Yea apparently. There have been models of the ship with the VLS, but atleast the arm-launcher is going to be fitted on the repeat-talwars which are nearing completion, and the consensus in russian boards seems to be that arm-launcher would be fitted to the first Russian versions of the ship. Needless to say, the devolpment of the VLS Sthill is propably facing some proplems.
Re: Pr. 11356 Update
A relatively small arm launcher like that would, in all honestly, contribute negligibly to the RCS of a ship anyway.
Re: Pr. 11356 Update
What is that huge missile on the Teg class? Brahmos? Yakhont?
Re: Pr. 11356 Update
BrahMos
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
Re: Pr. 11356 Update
What makes you think the superiority of VLS is primarily a function of radar cross section?klagldsf wrote:A relatively small arm launcher like that would, in all honestly, contribute negligibly to the RCS of a ship anyway.
Re: Pr. 11356 Update
What makes you think I implied that?erik_t wrote:What makes you think the superiority of VLS is primarily a function of radar cross section?klagldsf wrote:A relatively small arm launcher like that would, in all honestly, contribute negligibly to the RCS of a ship anyway.
