Would you mind posting it here? I've been looking for it for some time.TurretHead wrote:PS I just found your Alouette III which is heaps better than the one on the big sheet of helos. I was redrawing it until then. Will just have to do the front and top views of the Alowetta.
Planebucket Discussion Thread
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
- darthpanda
- Posts: 3437
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:14 pm
- Location: HOLLAND!!!!!!!
- Contact:
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Darth Panda - I presume that is the A Aardvark (because the intakes are the same as on the EF-111A)? And which intakes are you representing there (Triple Plow 1)?
I'm just asking so at some point I can kitbash out the Rest of the planes (B,C,D,E,F,K, and the FB-111A/F-111G, and eventually I hope FB-111H).
I'm just asking so at some point I can kitbash out the Rest of the planes (B,C,D,E,F,K, and the FB-111A/F-111G, and eventually I hope FB-111H).
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Wasn't the F-111 already drawn?
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Yes but If I recall it didn't have any shading or on it.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Blood and Fire
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
It was, but it was really bad quality, just like the current FB-111H.Colosseum wrote:Wasn't the F-111 already drawn?
IIRC the only 'Good' Original planes were the F-14. F-15, EA-6B,Tu-22M, P-3C, and a few others.
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
TimothyC wrote:Darth Panda - I presume that is the A Aardvark (because the intakes are the same as on the EF-111A)? And which intakes are you representing there (Triple Plow 1)?
I'm just asking so at some point I can kitbash out the Rest of the planes (B,C,D,E,F,K, and the FB-111A/F-111G, and eventually I hope FB-111H).
Would be good to see the entire F-111 series up for show since by the end of this year The RAAF will be retiring the last of theses legendary strike aircraft.
As for Darth re-drawing of the Sea Harrier and Harrier IIs. Nice work and hopefully be the last and finial re-drawing of the type since there has been many drawing and Re-drawings of it in planebucket (at least 3 different re-drawings of the type from what i can recall)
Last edited by squizzy on August 30th, 2010, 11:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"The British Air Farce have droopped their bums on the water works..They have scored a direct hot on the pimps"- British agent/gendarme Officer Crabtree, "Allo,Allo."
- darthpanda
- Posts: 3437
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:14 pm
- Location: HOLLAND!!!!!!!
- Contact:
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
......aaahh...... the drawing is actually base on a E model. I though the intakes are so small on the shipbucket scale, no one will see it. I was planning to do the B and K model.TimothyC wrote:Darth Panda - I presume that is the A Aardvark (because the intakes are the same as on the EF-111A)? And which intakes are you representing there (Triple Plow 1)?
I'm just asking so at some point I can kitbash out the Rest of the planes (B,C,D,E,F,K, and the FB-111A/F-111G, and eventually I hope FB-111H).
I did not touch the F-15, EA-6B and certainly not the P-3C, F-14 and Tu-22M are already redone by me.TimothyC wrote:It was, but it was really bad quality, just like the current FB-111H.
IIRC the only 'Good' Original planes were the F-14. F-15, EA-6B,Tu-22M, P-3C, and a few others.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Well, no, my old F-111 *did* have shading... but whatever. The new one looks great, like all DP's works... maybe we ought to just start calling it DarthPandaBucket.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Technically, the F-111C should have the FB-111's wings, and all versions compared to the F-111A/B (not counting FB-111 variants) should have the air intakes relocated exactly one pixel aft
EDIT: ...actually, if they're based on the E-model, then they need to be moved exactly one pixel forward to make a "proper" F-111A/B.
EDIT: ...actually, if they're based on the E-model, then they need to be moved exactly one pixel forward to make a "proper" F-111A/B.