Planebucket Discussion Thread

Post Shipbucket parts sheets here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#21 Post by Thiel »

TurretHead wrote:PS I just found your Alouette III which is heaps better than the one on the big sheet of helos. I was redrawing it until then. Will just have to do the front and top views of the Alowetta.
Would you mind posting it here? I've been looking for it for some time.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
User avatar
darthpanda
Posts: 3437
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:14 pm
Location: HOLLAND!!!!!!!
Contact:

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#22 Post by darthpanda »

Image
Worklist:
- Victorian Navy - LINK
- ROC/Taiwan - 中華民國空軍 / 陸軍航特部 / 海軍航空兵 - LINK
- RHKAAF / HKGFS - 皇家香港輔助空軍 / 政府飛行服務隊
- Gunbucket - LINK

天滅中共全黨死清光!
TimothyC
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact:

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#23 Post by TimothyC »

Darth Panda - I presume that is the A Aardvark (because the intakes are the same as on the EF-111A)? And which intakes are you representing there (Triple Plow 1)?

I'm just asking so at some point I can kitbash out the Rest of the planes (B,C,D,E,F,K, and the FB-111A/F-111G, and eventually I hope FB-111H).
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#24 Post by Colosseum »

Wasn't the F-111 already drawn?
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#25 Post by Blackbuck »

Yes but If I recall it didn't have any shading or on it.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
TimothyC
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact:

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#26 Post by TimothyC »

Colosseum wrote:Wasn't the F-111 already drawn?
It was, but it was really bad quality, just like the current FB-111H.

IIRC the only 'Good' Original planes were the F-14. F-15, EA-6B,Tu-22M, P-3C, and a few others.
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
squizzy
Posts: 173
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 1:52 am
Location: Adelaide, S.A Australia
Contact:

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#27 Post by squizzy »

TimothyC wrote:Darth Panda - I presume that is the A Aardvark (because the intakes are the same as on the EF-111A)? And which intakes are you representing there (Triple Plow 1)?

I'm just asking so at some point I can kitbash out the Rest of the planes (B,C,D,E,F,K, and the FB-111A/F-111G, and eventually I hope FB-111H).

Would be good to see the entire F-111 series up for show since by the end of this year The RAAF will be retiring the last of theses legendary strike aircraft.

As for Darth re-drawing of the Sea Harrier and Harrier IIs. Nice work and hopefully be the last and finial re-drawing of the type since there has been many drawing and Re-drawings of it in planebucket (at least 3 different re-drawings of the type from what i can recall)
Last edited by squizzy on August 30th, 2010, 11:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image

"The British Air Farce have droopped their bums on the water works..They have scored a direct hot on the pimps"- British agent/gendarme Officer Crabtree, "Allo,Allo."
User avatar
darthpanda
Posts: 3437
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:14 pm
Location: HOLLAND!!!!!!!
Contact:

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#28 Post by darthpanda »

TimothyC wrote:Darth Panda - I presume that is the A Aardvark (because the intakes are the same as on the EF-111A)? And which intakes are you representing there (Triple Plow 1)?

I'm just asking so at some point I can kitbash out the Rest of the planes (B,C,D,E,F,K, and the FB-111A/F-111G, and eventually I hope FB-111H).
......aaahh...... the drawing is actually base on a E model. I though the intakes are so small on the shipbucket scale, no one will see it. I was planning to do the B and K model.
TimothyC wrote:It was, but it was really bad quality, just like the current FB-111H.

IIRC the only 'Good' Original planes were the F-14. F-15, EA-6B,Tu-22M, P-3C, and a few others.
I did not touch the F-15, EA-6B and certainly not the P-3C, F-14 and Tu-22M are already redone by me.
Worklist:
- Victorian Navy - LINK
- ROC/Taiwan - 中華民國空軍 / 陸軍航特部 / 海軍航空兵 - LINK
- RHKAAF / HKGFS - 皇家香港輔助空軍 / 政府飛行服務隊
- Gunbucket - LINK

天滅中共全黨死清光!
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#29 Post by Colosseum »

Well, no, my old F-111 *did* have shading... but whatever. The new one looks great, like all DP's works... maybe we ought to just start calling it DarthPandaBucket.
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

#30 Post by klagldsf »

Technically, the F-111C should have the FB-111's wings, and all versions compared to the F-111A/B (not counting FB-111 variants) should have the air intakes relocated exactly one pixel aft :P



EDIT: ...actually, if they're based on the E-model, then they need to be moved exactly one pixel forward to make a "proper" F-111A/B.
Post Reply