Planebucket Discussion Thread

[Blackbuck]

Not hard to do it yourself. Pretty sure there is plenty of reference material about.

[chrisgatt7]

Dang thats some good stuff

DO NOT POST COMMENTS IN THE PLANEBUCKET THREAD.

-TimothyC.

[nighthunter]

I can upload a new one with the gear down, gives me something to work on, albeit quickly.

[TimothyC]

They look good, and dimensionally they look to check out. They'll get added to the 4th Gen Working sheet.

[klagldsf]

Yeah, I know dude, still the point, no one has said squat.

Well at the very least it's a hell of a lot better than the first "attempt" (no offense Ace :p )

But yeah, it's great.

haha I agree, my version was AU + crappy + I didn't even knew there should be panel lines on back then
my 3d looks a whole lot better though XD

It would seem to me that you actually based your drawing off of your 3D model, which would actually explain the loss of quality since the 3D model just isn't that detailed.

[acelanceloet]

that is correct the model is detailed enough, and so is the drawing... I just missed the panel lines, which weren't on the model

[Portsmouth Bill]

Thanks Nighthunter; I like the Hawk 200, a reasonable Hunter replacement.

Moved from Planebucket thread. I really didn't expect to have to move a Mod's post

-Timothy C.

[klagldsf]

It would be more accurate to graft the H200 nose onto a T-45 frame for a navalized version...provided it even makes any difference at this scale.

[Maple-leaf-Warrior]

That is probably the cuetest jet I've ever seen!

Moved from Planebucket thread. You guys need to stop posting in the wrong thread.

-Timothy C.

[Obsydian Shade]

Those are really amazing--makes me want to design a carrier just for them, and an AU just for the carrier. They'd look adorable on something like that mini-harrier upscaled for them.

Moved from Planebucket thread. You guys need to stop posting in the wrong thread.

-Timothy C.