M-frigate development

Post any drawings of planned or conceptual ships.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: M-frigate development

#21 Post by acelanceloet »

IMO, that would look real bad.... I could remove the 'outher' ones maybe, but I think it is better as it is.... any comments on the ship?
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Mitchell van Os
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm

Re: M-frigate development

#22 Post by Mitchell van Os »

Thiel wrote:Brackets within brackets are not a winning solution.
Mooring rings? Or?
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
Image
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: M-frigate development

#23 Post by acelanceloet »

no he means 'haakjes' around the description. I misunderstood that at first too :)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: M-frigate development

#24 Post by acelanceloet »

Image
this is the 1987 concept. close to the final one, as you can see. found refs for this one recently, and I hope to be able to start on the ones I gave to mitch soon too.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: M-frigate development

#25 Post by acelanceloet »

Image
and the concept just before this one....
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: M-frigate development

#26 Post by Thiel »

How about mentioning which concept is which on the drawing?
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: M-frigate development

#27 Post by acelanceloet »

well, the fact is that I have no data about that. they were both in the same publication, of 1987, while the one with the Mk 29 is of course earlier. so I could do the same with the drawings as I did with the names (one 1987 and one 1986) but I am not even sure of that.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Gollevainen
Posts: 4712
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: M-frigate development

#28 Post by Gollevainen »

I would like to remind all people about this little moderation I did while back ago

Now, I was pretty clear. Mitchell's worklist is MINE now. Anybody wanting to get stuff out of it, has to ask permission for it from Me. This will be last time I do friendly warning over the matter. Next time the banhammer will fall.

The air of this forum has been poisened allready too much by the arguing of ace and mitchell. Banning one of you should have solved the proplem. I seriously Do not want to return to these issues any more, but If I do, it will be the last time. Now get back drawing stuff, not claiming someone else's work just to get back at them in personal level.
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: M-frigate development

#29 Post by acelanceloet »

I was looking around in the archive, and I found this ship...
Image
anybody has any intel about it, as it seems to have some major flaws (most notably, all CIWS arnament up front and the lack of directors)
so I am wondering were this proposal comes from, as I can't find anything about it.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
DER386
Posts: 41
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:36 am

Re: M-frigate development

#30 Post by DER386 »

acelanceloet wrote:I was looking around in the archive, and I found this ship...
Image
anybody has any intel about it, as it seems to have some major flaws (most notably, all CIWS arnament up front and the lack of directors)
so I am wondering were this proposal comes from, as I can't find anything about it.
It looks like the "M" class design mated with the OHP class
Post Reply