Boeing FB-5:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fd94/9fd94596895135d5bebc2edbc32ef54d02f9ad9a" alt="Image"
Northrop XFT:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/230b7/230b7906a7f761905fa1278f7d5192568dbb4add" alt="Image"
Moderator: Community Manager
Well, I would say you had. because I have your drawing on my drive since 2016.nighthunter wrote: ↑October 17th, 2023, 9:32 pm So, first the Boeing FB-5, which I swear I posted when it was made, but can't find evidence that I have.
Well, that explains it, photobucket has it, bastards.Cascadia wrote: ↑October 18th, 2023, 4:30 pmWell, I would say you had. because I have your drawing on my drive since 2016.nighthunter wrote: ↑October 17th, 2023, 9:32 pm So, first the Boeing FB-5, which I swear I posted when it was made, but can't find evidence that I have.
Hey buddy, was looking at this to make Vought's upgraded version of the V-143 from your well done V-141, only problem is, that your V-141 is 2 pixels too long for the V-143, which has a lengthened rear fuselage. The V-141 is 6.95m long which multiplied by 22.093 is almost 154 pixels. The V-143 is 7.92m long which multiplied by 22.093 is almost 175 pixels. I'm guessing there's a scaling error somewhere.Bordkanone 75 wrote: ↑June 21st, 2023, 5:02 am
United States of America, Vought V-141
unstable, prone to spins, and best of all, no customers.