American Never-Built Destroyers

Post any drawings of planned or conceptual ships.

Moderator: Community Manager

Post Reply
Message
Author
dalamace
Posts: 182
Joined: September 11th, 2017, 11:59 am

American Never-Built Destroyers

#1 Post by dalamace »

Hello,

Making the destroyer S-511-51, an American never-built warship designed in 10 March 1942 armed with twin 5-inch guns and a pair of quintuple torpedo launchers. It is a preliminary design that would eventually lead to the Allen M. Somner class destroyer.

Image

Thank You
emperor_andreas
Posts: 3909
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact:

Re: American Never-Built Destroyers

#2 Post by emperor_andreas »

Very nice work!
Image
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB
Hood
Posts: 7243
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: American Never-Built Destroyers

#3 Post by Hood »

Very nice, good to see more of these early designs.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
Graham1973
Posts: 137
Joined: September 18th, 2011, 2:20 pm

Re: American Never-Built Destroyers

#4 Post by Graham1973 »

Very nice, where did you find the design?
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: American Never-Built Destroyers

#5 Post by erik_t »

The drawing is provided in Sumrall's Sumner-Gearing-Class Destroyers, a book which I can heartily recommend (although it is not quite so insightful as Friedman's works, its scope is narrower and more precise).

A quibble: I think that by the time SG waveguide issues had been sorted out, SC would be an unlikely air search fit. I welcome Colosseum's correction on this :)
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: American Never-Built Destroyers

#6 Post by Colosseum »

It all depends on "when" this ship is supposedly launched - for one thing, Measure 15 was long out of use by the time the Sumner and Gearing class ships were coming online. I think a more realistic radar fit is probably the standard SC-2 and SG on the foremast for these ships as Erik calls out. Camouflage would be a Measure 31/32/33 variant, Measure 21, or Measure 22 (depending on fleet assignment and date in service - dazzle schemes were generally painted out by Dec 44).

This is the issue with trying to draw these prelim designs. Do we draw the "as designed" fit, and leave the date off, or do we try to draw the prelim design as it would have appeared in service? Obviously this is up to the author.
dalamace
Posts: 182
Joined: September 11th, 2017, 11:59 am

Re: American Never-Built Destroyers

#7 Post by dalamace »

Hello,

Re: Graham1973, I found it in Spring Style Book as released by the USN Bureau of Ships.

As for the erik_t and Colo, I will admit that to say that I use a smidgen of artistic license and "fun" which I is kind of a bad approach now that I think about it. I think this drawing was especially poor form in my opinion with all the anachronisms... Sorry!

This one should be mildly better:

Image

The 1942 design was largely because this design was created in 1942... although even with American industries, BuShip would be hardpressed to make a destroyer within a single day...

Thank You
Last edited by dalamace on March 26th, 2020, 2:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
ptdockyard
Posts: 13
Joined: January 4th, 2014, 2:17 am

Re: American Never-Built Destroyers

#9 Post by ptdockyard »

I for one love the Measure 15 scheme and have used it on several 1/1200 models up to a what if USN 1935 Battleship Scheme C.

I say show them in an "As Used" configuration, especially with some artistic license!

Dave G
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: American Never-Built Destroyers

#10 Post by eswube »

Interesting addition.
Post Reply