FD Aircraft 16

Post all FD scale drawings here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
Gollevainen
Posts: 4715
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: FD Aircraft 16

#271 Post by Gollevainen »

I'm afraid that's the last of Naixoterk's works (unless, of course, he will return
ok, well I admire you (and others) who had completed these sets, really speaks about determination.
Albert1099
Posts: 138
Joined: December 20th, 2018, 11:09 am
Contact:

Re: FD Aircraft 16

#272 Post by Albert1099 »

Decided to make my own S-49 in my style, if there are ny mistakes, pointing them out would be helpful!
Image
Gotta take the good with the bad,
Smile with the sad,
Love what you got,
And remember what you had.
User avatar
Bordkanone 75
Posts: 643
Joined: October 6th, 2016, 1:46 am
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: FD Aircraft 16

#273 Post by Bordkanone 75 »

Cockpit shading is a turn-off, but otherwise good job! Here's something to supplement them.
Image
Japan, Kawasaki Ki-96
In your dreams. ~ Yae Miko
報園-872 (方義鑑銃)
Patriotic Presentation Number 872, Q-102 (A6M3-32 captured in Buna, New Guinea)
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: FD Aircraft 16

#274 Post by eswube »

@Bordkanone75
Nice work. Keep it up.

@Albert1099
It's not bad (though already 3rd S-49 we have ;) ), but I have few remarks.
I agree with BK75 that window shade is not the best choice, but it's rather marginal thing.
More significantly though, I see a problem with canopy as a whole. I don't quite understad why You haven't simply recycled central (movable) part from S-49A on S-49C (and why that central part looks like it was made of 3 completely separate elements? - see (1) on the drawing below). Also, the rear part of canopy on 49A has that black-outlined-frame and on 49C not - I'd suggest to decide either way for both. Also, from the photos it seems to me that windscreen on both models differed (on 49A resembling Yak-3, on 49C resembling Yak-9) - here I shamelessly will suggest You to perhaps take a look on (my) drawings of these (see (2) below), where also instead of 3-pixel thick outline of the frame, I used simply darker shade of "fuselage" color.
It is also my sincere belief, that contour of the bottom part of the rear fuselage was (at least for the most part) a straight line (or at least a very gentle arc - same applies to these "ribs" on 49A and panel lines on 49C. (see (3) below).
The cooler/charger/? on 49C - considering it's shape, it could be arguably outlined in black (though I'd be against it personally) but definitely in much darker shade (to show that it's more than just another panel line) - and certainly the forward part of it must be outlined in black because it's standing out from the surface behind it ( https://www.flickr.com/photos/56388143@N06/19020641959 ) - I also have a feeling it was more vertically symmetrical (see (4) below).
Last but not least, there are some perfectly avoidable double-black lines (see (5) below).

Image
User avatar
Bordkanone 75
Posts: 643
Joined: October 6th, 2016, 1:46 am
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: FD Aircraft 16

#275 Post by Bordkanone 75 »

Image
Japan, Mitsubishi G4M1 Hamaki
Once you light it, it burns. Just like a Zippo!
In your dreams. ~ Yae Miko
報園-872 (方義鑑銃)
Patriotic Presentation Number 872, Q-102 (A6M3-32 captured in Buna, New Guinea)
Albert1099
Posts: 138
Joined: December 20th, 2018, 11:09 am
Contact:

Re: FD Aircraft 16

#276 Post by Albert1099 »

eswube wrote: October 7th, 2019, 10:15 pm @Bordkanone75
Nice work. Keep it up.

@Albert1099
It's not bad (though already 3rd S-49 we have ;) ), but I have few remarks.
I agree with BK75 that window shade is not the best choice, but it's rather marginal thing.
More significantly though, I see a problem with canopy as a whole. I don't quite understad why You haven't simply recycled central (movable) part from S-49A on S-49C (and why that central part looks like it was made of 3 completely separate elements? - see (1) on the drawing below). Also, the rear part of canopy on 49A has that black-outlined-frame and on 49C not - I'd suggest to decide either way for both. Also, from the photos it seems to me that windscreen on both models differed (on 49A resembling Yak-3, on 49C resembling Yak-9) - here I shamelessly will suggest You to perhaps take a look on (my) drawings of these (see (2) below), where also instead of 3-pixel thick outline of the frame, I used simply darker shade of "fuselage" color.
It is also my sincere belief, that contour of the bottom part of the rear fuselage was (at least for the most part) a straight line (or at least a very gentle arc - same applies to these "ribs" on 49A and panel lines on 49C. (see (3) below).
The cooler/charger/? on 49C - considering it's shape, it could be arguably outlined in black (though I'd be against it personally) but definitely in much darker shade (to show that it's more than just another panel line) - and certainly the forward part of it must be outlined in black because it's standing out from the surface behind it ( https://www.flickr.com/photos/56388143@N06/19020641959 ) - I also have a feeling it was more vertically symmetrical (see (4) below).
Last but not least, there are some perfectly avoidable double-black lines (see (5) below).

Image
Thanks for the help! really missed and messed up some details, I forgot. Also trying a different shade for my windows, should I keep these, I'll have this replaced by your style if it''s not good enough.(Btw, marks and liveries are coming soon, IRL and AU)
Image
Gotta take the good with the bad,
Smile with the sad,
Love what you got,
And remember what you had.
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: FD Aircraft 16

#277 Post by eswube »

No problem.
Much better now. One thing, though - for S-49A I think that Yak-3 front windscreen would be more fitting (with "less metal frame", so to speak):

Image
User avatar
Bordkanone 75
Posts: 643
Joined: October 6th, 2016, 1:46 am
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: FD Aircraft 16

#278 Post by Bordkanone 75 »

Image
Germany, Messerschmitt Bf 163
Messerschmitt's STOL attempt.

Image
France, Breguet 163 AB.2
Chubby, is it?

Image
Italy, Savoia-Marchetti SM.93
Lie down.
In your dreams. ~ Yae Miko
報園-872 (方義鑑銃)
Patriotic Presentation Number 872, Q-102 (A6M3-32 captured in Buna, New Guinea)
Hood
Posts: 7238
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: FD Aircraft 16

#279 Post by Hood »

Very nice work and lovely additions.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: FD Aircraft 16

#280 Post by eswube »

Nice.
Post Reply