Great job Maomatic, along with everyone else so far in this challenge 
Fast battleship challenge! (Ended)
Moderator: Community Manager
-
Imperialist
- Posts: 397
- Joined: November 15th, 2012, 8:36 am
- Location: California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Fast battleship challenge!
Unique and beautiful! Great job Maomatic, along with everyone else so far in this challenge
Great job Maomatic, along with everyone else so far in this challenge FD Worklist
Me-262 Series
Fw-190/Ta-152 Series
Germany AU Thread
Luft '46 Thread
List of Aircraft with Acquired Data (Updated)
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... 80#p123956
Me-262 Series
Fw-190/Ta-152 Series
Germany AU Thread
Luft '46 Thread
List of Aircraft with Acquired Data (Updated)
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... 80#p123956
Re: Fast battleship challenge!
That alt-Scharnhorst is splendid.
Re: Fast battleship challenge!
Impressive, indeed.
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.
-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.
-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation
-
emperor_andreas
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
- Location: Corinth, MS USA
- Contact:
Re: Fast battleship challenge!
Very nice, Maomatic!
-
Garlicdesign
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: December 26th, 2012, 9:36 am
- Location: Germany
Re: Fast battleship challenge!
Hi Maomatic!
That one's really cool, a P-cruiser blown up to real size!
And for the record, I believe top-views are foul play in a challenge
. Excellent work on that one.
Greetings
GD
That one's really cool, a P-cruiser blown up to real size!
And for the record, I believe top-views are foul play in a challenge
. Excellent work on that one.Greetings
GD
-
heuhen
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
- Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Re: Fast battleship challenge!
I have also a top-view, but I am playing nice!Garlicdesign wrote: ↑June 4th, 2018, 7:35 pm Hi Maomatic!
That one's really cool, a P-cruiser blown up to real size!
And for the record, I believe top-views are foul play in a challenge
Greetings
GD
Re: Fast battleship challenge!
Note to all, I've revised my entry after someone pointed out that I'd screwed up the top view layering of the superstructure (or, more accurately, forgotten to correct it after some major changes in the side view); I took the opportunity to fix a few details I'd missed, as well.
As for top views being unfair... well, after my first attempt at a carrier, I just sort of got into the habit of always doing a top view. Thought it was fun, personally, and it helped me make sure that where I placed some of the details on the side view made sense.
As for top views being unfair... well, after my first attempt at a carrier, I just sort of got into the habit of always doing a top view. Thought it was fun, personally, and it helped me make sure that where I placed some of the details on the side view made sense.
-
Garlicdesign
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: December 26th, 2012, 9:36 am
- Location: Germany
Re: Fast battleship challenge!
Hi again!
Ahem... People... how many more of these do you need??
Greetings
GD
Ahem... People... how many more of these
do you need??Greetings
GD
Re: Fast battleship challenge!
Hats off to you rdfox76, thats an impressive first entry!
Regarding to views:
I think it helps to see if everything that you've put on the side view fits on the ship. And it is indeed fun to do.
But if someone feels that this is "cheating" (and I don't think GD meant it that way! ), the judges may fell free to disregard mine.
Besides, I think, one shouldn't take "competitions" on an internet forum too serious anyway...
@GD:
Oh man, I didn't even think about Kreuzer P when drawing this. Now that you say it, it does have an awful lot of similarities...
Fun fact: In the early stages of designing the Scharnhorsts, quad-turrets and even the 35cm C/34s were indeed considered. (and Diesel engines for that matter...)
edit: see above...^^
Regarding to views:
I think it helps to see if everything that you've put on the side view fits on the ship. And it is indeed fun to do.
But if someone feels that this is "cheating" (and I don't think GD meant it that way!
), the judges may fell free to disregard mine.Besides, I think, one shouldn't take "competitions" on an internet forum too serious anyway...
@GD:
Oh man, I didn't even think about Kreuzer P when drawing this. Now that you say it, it does have an awful lot of similarities...
Fun fact: In the early stages of designing the Scharnhorsts, quad-turrets and even the 35cm C/34s were indeed considered. (and Diesel engines for that matter...)
edit: see above...^^
Re: Fast battleship challenge!
I don't think including a plan view is cheating -- I awarded more points for those who go the extra mile to include them in the last challenge (treaty cruiser).