Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

Home for all our various official challenges in our offical scales

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
reytuerto
Posts: 1646
Joined: February 21st, 2015, 12:03 am

Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

#131 Post by reytuerto »

Hi, JSB:
Yes, it is feasible to put all the cruisers of the challenge in one sheet, but without the coat of arms and without the technicals specs. Cheers.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

#132 Post by heuhen »

congratulations to everybody

I had some ideas, but I never got happy with any of them and they wouldn't work
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

#133 Post by Colosseum »

Yes, I'd like to see the comments for each compiled into a chart in the first post. A big chart of each entry would be nice too. @shigure?
User avatar
Shigure
Posts: 967
Joined: May 25th, 2016, 2:05 pm

Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

#134 Post by Shigure »

Here you go, the link the the judging sheet. It'll be in the first post too.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
Image
BB1987
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy

Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

#135 Post by BB1987 »

Boys, I've spotted something off. Reginald/Regia gave 42 points to Rowdy's Romana Class cruiser, but in the totals sheet there is a 25 instead. He should get a total of 197 points, not 180. :P
maomatic
Posts: 493
Joined: February 20th, 2014, 7:46 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

#136 Post by maomatic »

Wow, with competition this strong, I wasn't sure, that I'd make it.
And looking at the scores it was indeed a very tight 'match'.

So, thank you very very much guys!

And well done to everyone who has participated. It was fun!
pepembr_mb
Posts: 172
Joined: December 15th, 2016, 12:17 pm

Just to show my learning curve

#137 Post by pepembr_mb »

This is my Brasil heavy cruiser redone after I read the critics:

Image


This is how she looks after her 1944 refit in USA:

Image
MihoshiK
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact:

Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

#138 Post by MihoshiK »

Already looking better, although the hull shading is still a bit wonky: The upper part of the above water hull shouldn't be a lighter tone unless it is completely vertical over that entire stretch.

As a further addition, might I suggest using single pixel portholes like Colo does in his new cruiser drawings? They more accurately depict the real size of portholes.

http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=7805
Would you please not eat my gun...
Image
JSB
Posts: 1433
Joined: January 21st, 2014, 5:33 pm

Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

#139 Post by JSB »

I agree the shading is better my questions would be,

1- why so much light AA on the first one (what's the date?)
2- would a float plane not be better on the earlier one?
3- why raise up the DP guns
4- what is the director (DP?) behind the front funnel doing would its arcs not be very limited and covered by the other two directors anyway? I would remove or place to the side in diamond?
pepembr_mb
Posts: 172
Joined: December 15th, 2016, 12:17 pm

Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

#140 Post by pepembr_mb »

JSB wrote: May 28th, 2018, 8:01 pm I agree the shading is better my questions would be,

1- why so much light AA on the first one (what's the date?)

2- would a float plane not be better on the earlier one?
The date is 1935 and the ship is in a Third World country to counter the Argentinian Admiral Brown heavy cruiser. In all Argentinian Navy there was only three floatplanes able to reconaissance duties. In the Brazilian Navy there was only one one torpedo bomber squadron able to coastal duties.
JSB wrote: May 28th, 2018, 8:01 pm3- why raise up the DP guns
To give her a better arch of fire.
JSB wrote: May 28th, 2018, 8:01 pm4- what is the director (DP?) behind the front funnel doing would its arcs not be very limited and covered by the other two directors anyway? I would remove or place to the side in diamond?
They are there to supplement the 5' guns. You have four anti aircraft directors covering 360°.
Post Reply