US ARMY Organization
Moderator: Community Manager
-
- Posts: 965
- Joined: February 18th, 2011, 6:46 am
Re: US ARMY Organization
Thank you!
As i said to Calis, if somebody Would see some Army's "newer" formations, just ask.
Regards
As i said to Calis, if somebody Would see some Army's "newer" formations, just ask.
Regards
"knowledge is like jam, the less you have the more you spread it"
- rundrewrun99
- Posts: 163
- Joined: January 1st, 2017, 10:48 pm
Re: US ARMY Organization
I personally would love to see some of the modern formations. Especially some of the specialized units like CSAR and SAR
-
- Posts: 965
- Joined: February 18th, 2011, 6:46 am
Re: US ARMY Organization
Rather the Air Force then. I will search what I can find in public documents about Rescue Squadrons.
For Special Operations Command, sources looks pretty scarce.
For Special Operations Command, sources looks pretty scarce.
"knowledge is like jam, the less you have the more you spread it"
Re: US ARMY Organization
Some mechanized infantry of WWII?
Re: US ARMY Organization
Well, I would love to see evolution of U.S. Armored Battalion just like you did with your Russian organizations likewise with M-41, M-46, M-47, M-48, M-60A1/A2, M-103 MBT's. M-551 etc.
From 1950s to present
Or evoultion of mobile artillery, self propelled guns.
Kind regards, I really admire your work and attention to detail.
From 1950s to present
Or evoultion of mobile artillery, self propelled guns.
Kind regards, I really admire your work and attention to detail.
Re: US ARMY Organization
One thing I have noticed in your organizational chart for a
U.S. tank battalion - the symbol you use for the light tank
company is actually the NATO symbol/icon for armored
cavalry. I think you need something else to represent the
light tank (M5 Stuart) company.
U.S. tank battalion - the symbol you use for the light tank
company is actually the NATO symbol/icon for armored
cavalry. I think you need something else to represent the
light tank (M5 Stuart) company.
Re: US ARMY Organization
Excellent! Superb work, Caddaric!
- rundrewrun99
- Posts: 163
- Joined: January 1st, 2017, 10:48 pm
Re: US ARMY Organization
Would Armored Cavalry not be the best descriptor for a light tank company?signal wrote: ↑March 1st, 2018, 2:18 am One thing I have noticed in your organizational chart for a
U.S. tank battalion - the symbol you use for the light tank
company is actually the NATO symbol/icon for armored
cavalry. I think you need something else to represent the
light tank (M5 Stuart) company.
-
- Posts: 965
- Joined: February 18th, 2011, 6:46 am
Re: US ARMY Organization
Thank you guys !
NATO what? Its a War Department conventional symbol from 1942...
Historicaly the division symbol was re-used for Brigades, Squadrons and Companies with a unit number at the left (4 or D). In some manuals, a little abbreviation (Rcn, LT, HQ, Serv.)
Actually I use this one to indicate clearly the activitiy. In this case:
"reconnaissance and security missions, screen the advance of other tank units, etc."
But to avoid controversy, I can go back to the good old way.
NATO what? Its a War Department conventional symbol from 1942...
Historicaly the division symbol was re-used for Brigades, Squadrons and Companies with a unit number at the left (4 or D). In some manuals, a little abbreviation (Rcn, LT, HQ, Serv.)
Actually I use this one to indicate clearly the activitiy. In this case:
"reconnaissance and security missions, screen the advance of other tank units, etc."
But to avoid controversy, I can go back to the good old way.
"knowledge is like jam, the less you have the more you spread it"
Re: US ARMY Organization
Frankly, you shouldn't care of the previous remarks (too much "à coté de le plaque"). Your drawing are just superb and there is nothing to add nor remove nor change.Caddaric79 wrote: ↑March 1st, 2018, 10:11 am Thank you guys !
NATO what? Its a War Department conventional symbol from 1942...
Historicaly the division symbol was re-used for Brigades, Squadrons and Companies with a unit number at the left (4 or D). In some manuals, a little abbreviation (Rcn, LT, HQ, Serv.)
Actually I use this one to indicate clearly the activitiy. In this case:
"reconnaissance and security missions, screen the advance of other tank units, etc."
But to avoid controversy, I can go back to the good old way.
Je pardonne à tous ceux qui m'ont offensé... mais je garde la liste!
Worklist, FD scale submarines and ships :
- Project 971 "Akula" (80%)
- Project 705 "Alpha" (10%)
- Project 371 (70%)
- Project 1459 (30%)
- Projekt 151 Sassnitz (To be redone)
Worklist, FD scale submarines and ships :
- Project 971 "Akula" (80%)
- Project 705 "Alpha" (10%)
- Project 371 (70%)
- Project 1459 (30%)
- Projekt 151 Sassnitz (To be redone)