US ARMY Organization

Post all FD scale drawings here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
Caddaric79
Posts: 965
Joined: February 18th, 2011, 6:46 am

Re: US ARMY Organization

#161 Post by Caddaric79 »

Thank you!

As i said to Calis, if somebody Would see some Army's "newer" formations, just ask.

Regards
"knowledge is like jam, the less you have the more you spread it"
User avatar
rundrewrun99
Posts: 163
Joined: January 1st, 2017, 10:48 pm

Re: US ARMY Organization

#162 Post by rundrewrun99 »

I personally would love to see some of the modern formations. Especially some of the specialized units like CSAR and SAR
Alternate Universe Projects:
Nation of Nukkumaa (A Septentrion Nation)
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8129
Caddaric79
Posts: 965
Joined: February 18th, 2011, 6:46 am

Re: US ARMY Organization

#163 Post by Caddaric79 »

Rather the Air Force then. I will search what I can find in public documents about Rescue Squadrons.
For Special Operations Command, sources looks pretty scarce.
"knowledge is like jam, the less you have the more you spread it"
madmike
Posts: 156
Joined: August 2nd, 2010, 4:02 pm

Re: US ARMY Organization

#164 Post by madmike »

Some mechanized infantry of WWII?
AF92
Posts: 63
Joined: April 11th, 2013, 3:10 pm

Re: US ARMY Organization

#165 Post by AF92 »

Well, I would love to see evolution of U.S. Armored Battalion just like you did with your Russian organizations likewise with M-41, M-46, M-47, M-48, M-60A1/A2, M-103 MBT's. M-551 etc.
From 1950s to present

Or evoultion of mobile artillery, self propelled guns.

Kind regards, I really admire your work and attention to detail.
signal
Posts: 283
Joined: August 6th, 2010, 5:44 pm

Re: US ARMY Organization

#166 Post by signal »

One thing I have noticed in your organizational chart for a
U.S. tank battalion - the symbol you use for the light tank
company is actually the NATO symbol/icon for armored
cavalry. I think you need something else to represent the
light tank (M5 Stuart) company.
User avatar
reytuerto
Posts: 1654
Joined: February 21st, 2015, 12:03 am

Re: US ARMY Organization

#167 Post by reytuerto »

Excellent! Superb work, Caddaric!
User avatar
rundrewrun99
Posts: 163
Joined: January 1st, 2017, 10:48 pm

Re: US ARMY Organization

#168 Post by rundrewrun99 »

signal wrote: March 1st, 2018, 2:18 am One thing I have noticed in your organizational chart for a
U.S. tank battalion - the symbol you use for the light tank
company is actually the NATO symbol/icon for armored
cavalry. I think you need something else to represent the
light tank (M5 Stuart) company.
Would Armored Cavalry not be the best descriptor for a light tank company?
Alternate Universe Projects:
Nation of Nukkumaa (A Septentrion Nation)
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8129
Caddaric79
Posts: 965
Joined: February 18th, 2011, 6:46 am

Re: US ARMY Organization

#169 Post by Caddaric79 »

Thank you guys !

NATO what? Its a War Department conventional symbol from 1942...

Historicaly the division symbol was re-used for Brigades, Squadrons and Companies with a unit number at the left (4 or D). In some manuals, a little abbreviation (Rcn, LT, HQ, Serv.)

Actually I use this one to indicate clearly the activitiy. In this case:
"reconnaissance and security missions, screen the advance of other tank units, etc."

But to avoid controversy, I can go back to the good old way.
"knowledge is like jam, the less you have the more you spread it"
Cplnew83
Posts: 419
Joined: January 9th, 2012, 9:50 am

Re: US ARMY Organization

#170 Post by Cplnew83 »

Caddaric79 wrote: March 1st, 2018, 10:11 am Thank you guys !

NATO what? Its a War Department conventional symbol from 1942...

Historicaly the division symbol was re-used for Brigades, Squadrons and Companies with a unit number at the left (4 or D). In some manuals, a little abbreviation (Rcn, LT, HQ, Serv.)

Actually I use this one to indicate clearly the activitiy. In this case:
"reconnaissance and security missions, screen the advance of other tank units, etc."

But to avoid controversy, I can go back to the good old way.
Frankly, you shouldn't care of the previous remarks (too much "à coté de le plaque"). Your drawing are just superb and there is nothing to add nor remove nor change.
Je pardonne à tous ceux qui m'ont offensé... mais je garde la liste!


Worklist, FD scale submarines and ships :
- Project 971 "Akula" (80%)
- Project 705 "Alpha" (10%)
- Project 371 (70%)
- Project 1459 (30%)
- Projekt 151 Sassnitz (To be redone)
Post Reply