Minotaur ZA Scheme

Post any drawings of planned or conceptual ships.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Deskjetser
Posts: 61
Joined: June 26th, 2015, 4:08 am

Minotaur ZA Scheme

#1 Post by Deskjetser »

The Minotaur Class
The escalation in the size of Neptune and the resultant cancellation lead to a new design being developed. The inspiration was the US cruiser Worcester CL-144 which towards the end of the second world war was seen as an attractive proposition by many RN officers.

Four new sketch designs were produced. In sketch A the main armamment comprised ten 6" in twin HA/LA turrets, the secondary armament being sixteen 3"/70cal in twin mountings. Both the 6" and 3" mountings were new designs where development was at an early stage.
Image
Rebuilding the Royal Navy: Warship Design Since 1945 By D. K. Brown, George Moore

Image

Dimensions
Length: 616' / 187.7m waterline; 621.5' / 189.5m overall
Beam: 73' / 22.2m
Power: 110,000shp

Deep condition
Displacement: 16,760 tons
Draught: 23'6"
Speed: 31.5kn
Complement: 1090

Standard condition:
Displacement: 13,870 tons
Draught: 20'

Weights in deep condition:
Hull: 6,470 tons
Armament: 2,235 tons
Equipment: 990 tons
Machinery: 2,150 tons
Armour & protection: 2,164 tons
Oil fuel & diesel oil: 2,570 tons
RFW: 180 tons

Armament:
10x6" guns in 5 twin DP turrets 400 RPG
16x3" guns in 8 twin mountings 800 RPG
16x21" Torpedoes in 4 QR MTGS 17 torpedoes
10x40mm guns in 10 mountings
15 Depth charges

Armour and protection:
Belt: 3.5" C
Bulkheads: 3.5" & 2" C
Protective bulkheads in machinery spaces: 1.25" DW
Magazine bulkheads: 1.25" DW
6" gun barbettes: 1.5" NC
Main deck: 1.5" NC
Lower deck: 1.5" NC

Stats and equipment names are direct quotes from source material
Last edited by Deskjetser on February 25th, 2018, 12:25 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Image
I made this banner in 2012 :D
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: Minotaur ZA Scheme

#2 Post by heuhen »

nice work


perhaps the most irritating ship to meet in World of Warship...
Hood
Posts: 7234
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: Minotaur ZA Scheme

#3 Post by Hood »

Beautiful work!

I've long wanted to draw this but never got around to it.
I'd love to see more of the Minotaur series.

The early LRS-1 directors as shown on the John Roberts plan are on the RN Radar sheet, look for the Long-Range System (LRS-1) on the gunnery director column, its the one with the two dishes (shown face on). It is the same mount but the dishes hide the sloped sides of the central structure that Roberts shows.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
adenandy
Posts: 1633
Joined: July 23rd, 2011, 1:46 am

Re: Minotaur ZA Scheme

#4 Post by adenandy »

She is indeed a very handsome looking vessel and, if built, would have had a long and successful career in commonwealth navies I'm thinking. :D

Nice looking ship and well drawn. :!:

Jolly well done sir :P
Tempest
Posts: 750
Joined: October 21st, 2013, 10:44 am
Location: Wales

Re: Minotaur ZA Scheme

#5 Post by Tempest »

Really nice drawing and great detailing. I’m not sure detailing the individual panels does anything for the drawing however, if you look at other drawings the majority they don’t have them I think it’s because it goes against the rules. Some shading and highlighting at the bow and stern would help in giving them depth.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: Minotaur ZA Scheme

#6 Post by heuhen »

yeah, you would not be able to see those paneling from long distance. and the hull would be welded, so there would be no visual panneling
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: Minotaur ZA Scheme

#7 Post by Colosseum »

Fabulous. Great to see a new member achieving such a high standard of drawing (arguably better than a lot of us here)!

My only minor suggestion would be to make the rigging color the same as the railing (right now it's kind of hard to see).
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Minotaur ZA Scheme

#8 Post by erik_t »

Very nice work, although IMHO the number of portholes is somewhat anachronistic. It's worth noting that neither the Tigers nor Vanguard had portholes below the second deck.

Presuming all of the 1950s kludge functioned as designed, the combination of QF 6", 3"/70, and 16 (!) torpedoes would be damned frighting to face in a short-range knife-fight.
User avatar
John_McCarthy1
Posts: 46
Joined: July 10th, 2017, 1:43 am
Location: Western PA

Re: Minotaur ZA Scheme

#9 Post by John_McCarthy1 »

lookin' good.
I'm curious to ask what you're going to do next, more proposals for the Minotaur or other designs entirely?
What I like to work on/plan to work on:
US ship Proposals and prototypes
Other ships that haven't yet been put up on Ship bucket
Suggestions Welcomed

Currently working on:
Heavy Cruiser Proposal CA-B: ~80% done.
Heavy Cruiser Proposal CA-C: ~5-10% done.
Heavy/Large Cruiser Proposal CA2-D: ~35% done.
FD Scale P-51A Dazzle Camo Livery: ~5-10% done.
Getting better: Always being worked on.

Finished:
FD Scale P-51D's Dazzle Camo Livery (might be redone)
FD Scale P-51D's German Captured Livery
Novice
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat

Re: Minotaur ZA Scheme

#10 Post by Novice »

That is a very beautiful work. This was a long awaited never built design.
This work should be commended, being done by a new artist, so well done.
Image Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
Post Reply