US ARMY Organization

Post all FD scale drawings here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Rhade
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland

Re: US ARMY Organization

#131 Post by Rhade »

Very impressive!
Image
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!
Calis
Posts: 182
Joined: March 29th, 2013, 6:10 pm

Re: US ARMY Organization

#132 Post by Calis »

Great work Caddaric79, the TO&Es were never like this while I was in, your work is truly inspiring
User avatar
darthpanda
Posts: 3461
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:14 pm
Location: HOLLAND!!!!!!!
Contact:

Re: US ARMY Organization

#133 Post by darthpanda »

Caddaric79 wrote: March 20th, 2017, 1:53 pm Thank you guys.
I hope DP will do the same with his WWII charts
My wife broke the computer so that I can't draw anything :oops:
Last edited by darthpanda on March 29th, 2017, 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Worklist:
- Victorian Navy - LINK
- ROC/Taiwan - 中華民國空軍 / 陸軍航特部 / 海軍航空兵 - LINK
- RHKAAF / HKGFS - 皇家香港輔助空軍 / 政府飛行服務隊
- Gunbucket - LINK

天滅中共全黨死清光!
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9109
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: US ARMY Organization

#134 Post by heuhen »

darthpanda wrote: March 28th, 2017, 7:22 am
Caddaric79 wrote: March 20th, 2017, 1:53 pm Thank you guys.
I hope DP will do the same with his WWII charts
My wife broke the computer so that I can't drawing anything :oops:
Insert stereotypic joke.

Shit happens... hope we see you soon
Caddaric79
Posts: 965
Joined: February 18th, 2011, 6:46 am

Re: US ARMY Organization

#135 Post by Caddaric79 »

I work on the US Armored Division model 1944 for some time.
I am not totally satisfied with the presentation but I post a first draft.

The Tank Battalion:
Mouved
http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic. ... 60#p178260
Last edited by Caddaric79 on February 24th, 2018, 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"knowledge is like jam, the less you have the more you spread it"
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: US ARMY Organization

#136 Post by eswube »

Well, to me it looks great. :shock:
signal
Posts: 283
Joined: August 6th, 2010, 5:44 pm

Re: US ARMY Organization

#137 Post by signal »

Great looking U.S. Medium Tank Bn. Your work,
especially showing the officers and men (and trailers), etc.
really makes it easy to understand.
nighthunter
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm

Re: US ARMY Organization

#138 Post by nighthunter »

Only correction needed, "Loader", not "Cannoneer"
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
adenandy
Posts: 1637
Joined: July 23rd, 2011, 1:46 am

Re: US ARMY Organization

#139 Post by adenandy »

I fully concur with the above comments Caddaric, it looks FANTASTIC my old china :!:

Jolly WELL DONE old chap :D
Caddaric79
Posts: 965
Joined: February 18th, 2011, 6:46 am

Re: US ARMY Organization

#140 Post by Caddaric79 »

Thank you guys!
So, I'll continue this way :-)
nighthunter wrote: July 27th, 2017, 2:49 am Only correction needed, "Loader", not "Cannoneer"
In the 7 TO&E from 15/09/1943 to 21/06/1945, the US Army called it "Cannoneer (Specification S/N 2736)" so I'm feeling confident about that.
"knowledge is like jam, the less you have the more you spread it"
Post Reply