The SMSWorld

Post drawings from any Alternate Universe scenario here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
sebu
Posts: 646
Joined: August 18th, 2010, 9:18 am

Re: The SMSWorld

#111 Post by sebu »

Nice job Boss! Especially a nasty F-14...
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: The SMSWorld

#112 Post by Colosseum »

I've reworked some of the F-2s. More to come:

Image

The "RF-2B", basically a tactical reconnaissance variant of the F-2B with the DB-110 pod (thanks to Glaciesfire for all the excellent F-16 parts!)

Image

The RF-4C tactical recce aircraft being replaced by the RF-2B:

Image

A "what if" Praetonian F-15E. We decided to go with the Super Hornet instead as the heavy fighter for the Commonwealth nations:

Image
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: The SMSWorld

#113 Post by Colosseum »

Some more stuff.

First, the (ridiculous) electronic warfare "EF-14" I've invented for Doom's country:

Image

Some more updated F-2s, first a maritime strike configuration and then a precision bombing loadout with the European 1 scheme:

Image
Image

The operational conversion trainer TF-2B variant with air combat maneuvering instrumentation pod, laser guided training rounds, and extra fuel tanks, painted in the standard maritime scheme.

Image
User avatar
Obsydian Shade
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact:

Re: The SMSWorld

#114 Post by Obsydian Shade »

Love your F-14s! Always thought that was the sexiest aircraft ever, and it's a shame the line couldn't have continued with more advanced versions. I know that Grumman did have them on the drawing board, after all, but alas, too many things intervened.....
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: The SMSWorld

#115 Post by Colosseum »

Naturally I went overboard with the F-2 revisions and invented a bunch of variants that basically wouldn't work IRL, but this is AU after all. Yes, I realize that "F-2CJ" is not a really realistic designation but I went off the F-16CJ, so... there. Same with F-2DJ (and really all the others...) The RF-2 is just a normal F-2 with a DB-110 recon pod and Sniper XR. The F-2S/MTD ACTIVE is a completely ridiculous "super" version I made using elements from the F-16 MATV (thrust vectoring demonstrator) and the F-16 AFTI (integrated FLIR/NAV component demonstrator).

Image

And of course, a variant of the last one with a paint scheme and a loadout (thanks again to GLACIESFIRE for his excellent F-16 kit):

Image
User avatar
Obsydian Shade
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact:

Re: The SMSWorld

#116 Post by Obsydian Shade »

Personally, I think the F-16 MATV elements are a stroke of genius--makes for both an attractive, and distinctive aircraft that stands out from the rest of the pack.

I do admit, however, the F-2 designation keeps making me think I'm looking at a modified Mitsubishi F-2. Are there any plans for F-16XL versions to show up? Since you have F-15Es, they likely aren't needed, but could always be export aircraft.
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: The SMSWorld

#117 Post by Colosseum »

... you are literally looking at modified variants of Darth Panda's Mitsubishi F-2. ;) :P The manufacturer name has been changed to "MacMillan" because they are produced by a company in North Point (an English-speaking Western-style nation) in the SMSWorld AU.

The F-15Es are non-canon (as are the B-52s). They were thought experiments to see what those aircraft would look like in North Point paint schemes. The F-2 is the primary land-based/air force fighter aircraft operated by North Point - with F/A-18C/D operated as the primary carrier aircraft (those soon to come).
User avatar
Cascadia
Posts: 604
Joined: September 1st, 2010, 12:05 pm
Location: Germany

Re: The SMSWorld

#118 Post by Cascadia »

Colosseum wrote:The F-2 is the primary land-based/air force fighter aircraft operated by North Point - with F/A-18C/D operated as the primary carrier aircraft (those soon to come).
Is North Point going to operate aircraft carrier(s)? Although an Island nation, isn't North Point a bit small for a modern carrier?
I still have to get through that moon landing plot :?
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: The SMSWorld

#119 Post by Colosseum »

We've changed quite a bit of the backstory and North Point is now a lot larger, with a bigger role to play worldwide. It sounds like it might be getting two Forrestal equivalents in the near future, but produced by its larger ally.

None of this is set in stone because no one can make a decision on how large the main Commonwealth player's navy is going to be.

(also, keep in mind that most of this AU is tongue-in-cheek ;) and to never, ever take any of it seriously..)
User avatar
odysseus1980
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact:

Re: The SMSWorld

#120 Post by odysseus1980 »

Forrestal carriers with F-14s? Νice.
Post Reply